Zombie film '28 Years Later' was shot on iPhone 15 Pro Max
by Malcolm Owen · AppleInsiderThe upcoming Danny Boyle horror sequel "28 Years Later" was shot on the iPhone 15 Pro Max, marking another movie that took advantage of Apple's product lines.
Principal filming of "28 Years Later," a continuation of the "28 Days Later" franchise, took place over the summer. But while filming was largely guarded with secrecy, one about how it was filmed has leaked out.
Multiple people familiar with the production confirmed to Wired that the iPhone 15 Pro Max was used by director Boyle and cinematographer Anthony Dod Mantle.
During filming, staff were prevented from revealing the information via NDAs. However, a shot from July gave a hint that the filming was not using normal cameras.
The shot showed star Jodie Cromer near a movie camera that, at first glance, looked like a typical big camera rig. Further examination by the publication revealed that it was a cinema camera lens but attached to a protective case capable of holding an iPhone.
The case is thought to be an aluminum cage, designed not only to protect camera hardware but also to easily attach adapters. Some of these adapters could be used to make large lenses interface with the cameras used on smartphones, expanding the potential shot choices of the director.
Small tech, big screen
Shooting on a smartphone, like an iPhone, is not entirely new for Boyle. Filming "28 Days Later" included time limitations that didn't work with traditional camera gear, forcing Boyle to think differently.
For that film, he used the Canon XL-1, a prosumer camcorder that recorded to MiniDV tapes. However, the limitations of video technology in 2002 led to problems such as an inability to properly upscale the lower-resolution 480p footage.
With the capability of recording at 4K, the iPhone 15 Pro Max certainly won't have that issue.
Apple's release of the iPhone 15 Pro introduced many filmmaker-friendly features, including being able to record ProRes 4K video at 60fps to an external USB-C drive. Apple also included the ability to record in a flat profile, which helps with color correction in editing, and ACES support, among other updates.
The technical capabilities of the iPhone have been used more in productions, such as early effort"Unsane" from 2018. Broadcasters are also leaning on the hardware for outside broadcasts, including the BBC covering the UK election and various productions during the coronavirus pandemic.
Apple itself has also used iPhones to shoot Apple Events, famously doing so during its 2023 "Scary Fast" announcements.
"28 Years Later" is anticipated to be released during the summer of 2025.
5 Comments
m4m40 7 comments · 3 Years
About 19 hours ago
I’d expect new movies to be shot in a format that’s compatible with 8k or better. iPhone.. really ???
Marvin 15286 comments · 18 Years
About 18 hours ago
m4m40 said:
I’d expect new movies to be shot in a format that’s compatible with 8k or better. iPhone.. really ???
While movie cameras are still way better for filming big budget movies, the iPhone 15 is a big step up in quality over the original 28 Days Later. That footage was terrible:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eCdRFMp8Xwo
Canon XL-1 is 480p, standard definition.
iPhone 15 Pro Max can produce some very nice looking results with ProRes Log format:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QUx1anKHYuI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wqjtlGrWzYA
Here there's a comparison to an expensive movie camera, 5:30:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KlnniPaDGDM
The softer footage of the expensive camera can come from the lenses used, that's just a bare iPhone. The iPhone has a big advantage with stabilization as it has an accelerometer. It's much lighter for holding when filming close shots like right in an actor's face without bumping into the actor. The iPhone can also film stereo/spatial video, can be attached to a drone for aerial shots and is water resistant.
Apple's own TV shows and movies use Arri Alexa cameras:
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt13287846/technical/
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0804484/technical/
There's no question expensive movie cameras offer better overall image quality, bigger sensors, better resolution, colors, light levels but footage from modern iPhones rivals lower-end film cameras. All that matters is the final result.
brauntj 10 comments · 9 Years
About 17 hours ago
This is cool. Now can we watch 28 Days Later?
danox 3242 comments · 11 Years
About 13 hours ago
Marvin said:
m4m40 said:
I’d expect new movies to be shot in a format that’s compatible with 8k or better. iPhone.. really ???
While movie cameras are still way better for filming big budget movies, the iPhone 15 is a big step up in quality over the original 28 Days Later. That footage was terrible:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eCdRFMp8Xwo
Canon XL-1 is 480p, standard definition.
iPhone 15 Pro Max can produce some very nice looking results with ProRes Log format:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QUx1anKHYuI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wqjtlGrWzYA
Here there's a comparison to an expensive movie camera, 5:30:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KlnniPaDGDM
The softer footage of the expensive camera can come from the lenses used, that's just a bare iPhone. The iPhone has a big advantage with stabilization as it has an accelerometer. It's much lighter for holding when filming close shots like right in an actor's face without bumping into the actor. The iPhone can also film stereo/spatial video, can be attached to a drone for aerial shots and is water resistant.
Apple's own TV shows and movies use Arri Alexa cameras:
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt13287846/technical/
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0804484/technical/
There's no question expensive movie cameras offer better overall image quality, bigger sensors, better resolution, colors, light levels but footage from modern iPhones rivals lower-end film cameras. All that matters is the final result.
At the end of the day the quality of the script, the storytelling plus having/Introducing two really good young unknown at the time performers like Cillian Murphy and Naomi Harris doesn’t hurt the end product and both were great in that movie. I was pulled in by the acting and the storytelling. I’m didn’t notice what it was shot on, it could’ve been 8 mm and probably wouldn’t have made any difference. Ultimately good storytelling performance is king.
I must say at the time when I first saw the performances of Cillian Murphy and Naomi Harris, I said who are they?
canucklehead 401 comments · 18 Years
About 11 hours ago
Jodie Comer, not Cromer
Share Your Thoughts on our Forums ->