Latest Epstein files full of famous people, including Clinton, but not Trump

U.S. JUSTICE DEPT. via REUTERS

Former President Bill Clinton, Michael Jackson and Diana Ross are seen in this image released by the Department of Justice in WashingtonFriday as part of a new trove of documents from its investigations into the late financier and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

WASHINGTON >>The thousands of documents released by the U.S. Justice Department ‌related to the late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein were filled with the names of some of the world’s most famous people, including former President Bill Clinton, but there was one notable exception: President Donald Trump.

The department released only a partial tranche of the Epstein-related documents in its possession on Friday with much of the information within them redacted, citing the extensive effort required in reviewing the materials and the need to protect Epstein’s victims.

Trump’s administration was attempting to comply with a law overwhelmingly passed by Congress ‍in November that mandated the disclosure of all Epstein files, despite Trump’s months-long effort to keep them sealed.

The absence of references to Trump was notable given that pictures and documents related to him have trickled out of previous Epstein releases for years. Trump’s name appeared in flight manifests listing passengers on Epstein’s private plane that were part of a first batch of Epstein material the Justice Department released in February, for instance.

The release also contained other items of note, including a complaint accusing Epstein of ​involvement in “child pornography” that was filed with the FBI in 1996, long before law enforcement began looking into his misconduct.

Celebrities who appeared ​in photos made available as part of Friday’s release include the late news anchor Walter Cronkite, singers Mick Jagger, Michael Jackson and Diana Ross, British entrepreneur Richard Branson and the former Duchess of York, Sarah Ferguson.

Don't miss out on what's happening!

Stay in touch with breaking news, as it happens, conveniently in your email inbox. It's FREE!

Email Sign Up
By clicking to sign up, you agree to Star-Advertiser's and Google's Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. This form is protected by reCAPTCHA.

Many of the photos were undated and provided without context, and none of those figures have been accused of any wrongdoing in connection with Epstein.

Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor also appears in one photo lying across the laps of several women. The ‍former Duke of York, who was stripped of his royal title over his ties to Epstein, has denied any wrongdoing.

The scandal surrounding Epstein has ​become a political wound for Trump, who for years had promoted conspiracy theories about Epstein to his supporters.

The ⁠material released this week included evidence from several investigations into Epstein, along with photos of Clinton, long scorned by Republicans. But they appeared to include few if any photos of Trump or documents mentioning him, despite Trump and Epstein’s well-publicized friendship in the 1990s and early 2000s before they had a falling out prior to Epstein’s first conviction in 2008.

Trump has not been accused of wrongdoing and has denied knowing about Epstein’s crimes.

One file with a ⁠photo of Trump appeared to have been removed today from the dataset released by the Justice Department. Its absence was noted online by Democrats in the House of Representatives, who demanded an explanation from the administration.

Later today, more than a dozen files that had been released on Friday were no longer available to be viewed on the Justice Department’s website, according to NPR and the Associated Press.

The Justice Department and the White House did not immediately respond to queries about missing files.

It was not immediately clear how substantive the new materials were, given that many Epstein-related documents have previously been made public since his 2019 death in jail, which was ruled a suicide.

Many of the files were heavily redacted — several documents with 100 pages or more were entirely blacked out — and the Justice Department acknowledged it was still reviewing hundreds of thousands of additional pages ⁠for possible release.

One of Epstein’s victims, Marina Lacerda, reacted angrily to the large number of redactions and unreleased documents.

“All of us are infuriated by ‍this. It’s another slap in the face. We expected way more,” Lacerda told MS NOW today.

Last month, Democrats in the House released thousands of emails obtained from Epstein’s estate, including one in which Epstein wrote that Trump “knew about the girls,” without clarifying what that meant. Trump, in response, accused Democrats of promoting the “Epstein Hoax” as a distraction.

The Justice Department sought to draw attention ‍to Clinton, with two agency spokespeople posting on social media images that they said showed him with Epstein victims.

Clinton’s deputy chief of staff, Angel ​Urena, said in a statement that the White House was attempting to “shield themselves” from scrutiny by focusing on ‍the former president.

“They can release as many grainy 20-plus-year-old photos as they want, but this isn’t about Bill Clinton,” he wrote.

In a statement, the White House said the release demonstrated its transparency and commitment to justice for Epstein’s victims. But the disclosures occurred only because Congress forced the administration’s hand, after Trump officials declared earlier this year that no more Epstein files would be made public.

The disclosure law required the Justice Department to turn over information about its handling of the Epstein investigation, including internal reports and emails. None of those materials appeared to be in the batch of documents the government released on Friday.

The law allowed the Justice Department to withhold personal information about ​Epstein’s victims as well as material that would jeopardize an active investigation.

See more:National newsPolitics

85 Comments
By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the Terms of Service. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. If your comments are inappropriate, you may be banned from posting. Report comments if you believe they do not follow our guidelines. Having trouble with comments? Learn more here.
Please log in to comment