Biological aortic valves linked to better pregnancy outcomes, but more reoperations

by Catarina Thepper, Karolinska Institutet

edited by Lisa Lock, reviewed by Robert Egan

Lisa Lock

Scientific Editor

Meet our editorial team
Behind our editorial process

Robert Egan

Senior Editor

Meet our editorial team
Behind our editorial process Editors' notes

This article has been reviewed according to Science X's editorial process and policies. Editors have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility:

fact-checked

trusted source

proofread

The GIST Add as preferred source

In cases of serious aortic valve disease, choosing a new heart valve is particularly difficult for young women who wish to become pregnant. A new Swedish registry study from Karolinska Institutet shows that a biological aortic valve provides good pregnancy and birth outcomes, even though the need for reoperation is more common than with a mechanical valve. The study is published in the JACC.

In valve replacement surgery, there are mainly two options. Mechanical valves are very durable but require lifelong treatment with blood-thinning medication, which can pose risks for both the woman and the fetus during a possible pregnancy. Biological valves do not require the same type of blood-thinning treatment, but they wear out more quickly and may lead to the need for another operation later in life.

In the study, the researchers analyzed women in Sweden ages 18–40 who had undergone aortic valve replacement between 1997 and 2024. A total of 251 women were included, of whom 93 received a biological valve and 158 a mechanical valve. The information was obtained from national quality registers and other health data registers and was followed over a long period.

Contribute to better evidence for shared decisions

About half the women who received a biological valve had at least one child during the follow-up period, compared with just under 1 in 10 of those who received a mechanical valve. For those with a biological valve, cardiovascular outcomes were generally good despite high risks of reoperation.

"Our results show that a biological valve is a reasonable option for women who are planning a pregnancy, although one must be aware of the risk of future reoperation. We hope that the findings can contribute to better evidence for shared decisions between doctor and patient," said Ruixin Lu, doctoral student at the Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet.

"It is encouraging that many women with a biological aortic valve can undergo pregnancy and childbirth. At the same time, we know that many of these young women will later need to be operated on again, as the valve wears out over time. In our continued research, we are examining how assessment and treatment can be improved ahead of their next heart operation," said Ulrik Sartipy, cardiac surgeon at Karolinska University Hospital and adjunct professor at the Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet.

The researchers stress that the choice of valve must always be adapted to the individual patient's situation and life plans.

More information

Ruixin Lu et al, Aortic Valve Replacement in Women of Reproductive Age, JACC (2026). DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2026.05.024

Key medical concepts

Aortic Valve ReplacementAnticoagulation Therapy

Clinical categories

CardiologyPregnancyWomen's healthObstetrics & gynecology Provided by Karolinska Institutet Who's behind this story?

Lisa Lock

BA art history, MA material culture. Former museum editor, paramedic, and transplant coordinator. Editing for Science X since 2021. Full profile →

Robert Egan

Bachelor's in mathematical biology, Master's in creative writing. Well-traveled with unique perspectives on science and language. Full profile →

Citation: Biological aortic valves linked to better pregnancy outcomes, but more reoperations (2026, July 3) retrieved 3 July 2026 from https://medicalxpress.com/news/2026-07-biological-aortic-valves-linked-pregnancy.html This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.