Economic tool could help cities prioritize public health in urban development
· Medical Xpressedited by Swati Mestri, reviewed by Andrew Zinin
Swati Mestri
Scientific Editor
Meet our editorial team
Behind our editorial process
Andrew Zinin
Chief Editor
Meet our editorial team
Behind our editorial process Editors' notes
This article has been reviewed according to Science X's editorial process and policies. Editors have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility:
fact-checked
trusted source
proofread
The GIST Add as preferred source
Senior urban development decision-makers have revealed there is currently little incentive to consider public health impacts when shaping towns and cities, according to a new study published in Evidence & Policy that highlights the potential of an innovative economic valuation tool to address the problem.
Researchers argue that local authorities and planning departments could use the Health Appraisal for Urban Systems (HAUS) tool—a valuation model that links features of the environment to health outcomes and their associated economic costs—to support healthier urban development choices and reduce the incidence of diseases including obesity, cancer, cardiovascular disease and respiratory illness.
The study, co-authored by researchers at the University of East London (UEL), University of Bath and University of Bristol, found that stakeholders from government, industry and civil society recognized the value of HAUS as a new way to support shared decision-making and create incentives for organizations to work together to improve health outcomes.
The link between urban environments and public health is well established: Factors such as housing quality, transport infrastructure, access to green space and walkability all influence the risk of developing life-threatening diseases. However, improving urban environments as a preventive public health measure is complex and requires coordinated action from multiple stakeholders.
To assess how economic evidence could support more integrated decision-making, the researchers conducted 167 qualitative interviews with key stakeholders across England's urban development system. The interviews explored how HAUS could support collaboration and informed decision-making across sectors.
The tool was initially developed during an earlier research pilot and was further refined throughout the project in collaboration with the UK's Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government.
HAUS quantifies and monetizes changes in disease occurrence and premature mortality linked to different urban development interventions affecting local populations. By translating health outcomes into economic terms, the tool can help decision-makers better understand the long-term value of healthier urban environments and support more informed investment and planning decisions.
Dr. Andrew Barnfield, senior lecturer in public health at UEL and co-author of the study, said, "The HAUS tool enables decision-makers to account for health costs that are linked with the urban environment. As our work shows, this is vital for making healthier and more equitable places."
The researchers conclude that HAUS provides valuable evidence to encourage cross-sector collaboration and incorporate preventive public health into urban development decisions. The tool has since been adopted by the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government in its appraisal guides for local authorities.
Professor Sarah Ayres, from the University of Bristol's School for Policy Studies, said, "The collaboration between TRUUD and the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government has created a version of the Health Appraisal of Urban Systems (HAUS) model which is to be used for housing, community and local government interventions. For the first time, there are now methods to quantify and value the potential health impacts of urban interventions for specific populations."
Dr. Geoff Bates, from the University of Bath's Institute for Policy Research, said, "Making the economic case for pursuing preventive policies is one way to persuade policymakers to act to improve long-term health and well-being. Improving policymakers' access to evidence and tools like HAUS that demonstrate the savings to the public purse from investing in healthier housing and urban environments is a step toward improving public health."
More information
How can critical actors be incentivised to take a systems approach to pursue preventative public health?, Evidence & Policy (2026). DOI: 10.1332/17442648Y2026D000000107
Key medical concepts
Mortality, PrematureObesityCardiovascular Diseases
Clinical categories
Preventive medicineCommon illnesses & Prevention Provided by University of East London Who's behind this story?
Swati Mestri
Swati Mestri holds a bachelor's degree in Electronics Engineering and has worked as a content editor since 2019. She has experience editing research documents across technology, health care, and materials science, and has a particular interest in technology and space. Full profile →
Andrew Zinin
Master's in physics with research experience. Long-time science news enthusiast. Plays key role in Science X's editorial success. Full profile →
Citation: Economic tool could help cities prioritize public health in urban development (2026, September 9) retrieved 10 September 2026 from https://medicalxpress.com/news/2026-09-economic-tool-cities-prioritize-health.html This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.