Dual-mobility hip replacement implant can lower dislocation risk by 70%
· Medical Xpressedited by Stephanie Baum, reviewed by Robert Egan
Stephanie Baum
Scientific Editor
Meet our editorial team
Behind our editorial process
Robert Egan
Senior Editor
Meet our editorial team
Behind our editorial process Editors' notes
This article has been reviewed according to Science X's editorial process and policies. Editors have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility:
fact-checked
peer-reviewed publication
trusted source
proofread
The GIST Add as preferred source
A new type of hip replacement implant reduces the risk of joint dislocation after surgery by 70%, according to a new study involving 1,600 patients across 44 hospitals in Sweden and the UK, published in The Lancet. The new implant consists of a small ball encased in a much larger plastic ball, which provides better stability.
Each year, more than 14 million patients worldwide suffer a femoral neck fracture. Total hip replacement (THR), in which both the ball and socket of the hip are replaced, is recommended for older, active individuals with a displaced fracture of the femoral neck. While the vast majority regain good mobility and quality of life, up to 8% of these patients experience a dislocation of their hip, a very painful condition in which the artificial joint slips out of place.
New type of cup
In a new study, researchers from Uppsala University and Queen Mary University of London investigated whether a new type of cup, referred to as a dual-mobility total hip replacement (DM THR), could reduce the risk of complications.
"It is extremely painful when a hip replacement dislocates. When it occurs, patients require sedation or further surgery to realign the joint. Once the joint has dislocated, this impairs quality of life, as the patient may feel that they can no longer really trust the implant. There is also a significant strain on health care resources," says Nils Hailer, consultant orthopedic surgeon at Uppsala University Hospital, professor of orthopedics, and one of the researchers behind the study.
Patients from Sweden and the United Kingdom
The study included 1,600 people age 65 or older who had suffered a femoral neck fracture and who were deemed suitable for a THR. Patients treated at 20 hospitals in Sweden and 24 in the UK were randomly assigned to receive either a dual-mobility hip replacement or a standard hip replacement.
Risk reduced by 70%
The study found that the risk of dislocations decreased by 70% for patients who received the new dual-mobility cup. One year after surgery, only 1.3% of these patients had experienced hip dislocation, compared with 4.2% in the group that received a traditional hip replacement. In addition to the significant improvement in dislocations, the study showed that the overall risk of surgical complications was also lower in the group that received the new cup. However, no differences were observed between the groups in the incidence of implant infection or mortality, nor were there any differences in quality of life during the first year after surgery.
"I, along with our surgeons around the world, have been wondering if there is any benefit of these types of hip replacements in people with a broken hip for over a decade. I've tried to run similar studies before but never been able to deliver one that is big enough to give us a reliable answer to the question.
"Meeting the team in Uppsala and making this international collaboration a reality has been a game-changer for accelerating how quickly we can discover the answers to these sorts of questions," says Xavier Griffin, professor at Queen Mary University of London and Honorary Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeon at Barts Health NHS Trust.
The importance of including smaller hospitals in the research
"No one has previously conducted such a large study in which patients were randomly assigned to either a dual-mobility cup or the standard type of cup. It is very significant that we did not limit participation to university hospitals, but instead included smaller hospitals from a variety of locations in both countries, even from places without extensive research experience," says Hailer of Uppsala University.
"Together, surgeons in Sweden and the UK succeeded in delivering a large, pragmatic orthopedic randomized trial involving both smaller hospitals and major referral centers across two countries. Beyond the findings themselves, we believe this collaboration sets a new benchmark for future randomized trials in European orthopedic research."
No new technology or training required
Although dual-mobility implants are currently more expensive than standard implants, researchers believe the reduction in complications could offset the higher upfront cost and are currently undertaking a full health economic analysis.
"Crucially, DM-THR requires no new technology or training. Surgeons are already familiar with both implant types, meaning the change could be implemented immediately within existing practice," says Griffin.
Publication details
Dual mobility versus standard cups in total hip replacement for displaced femoral neck fractures (Duality): an international, multicentre, randomised controlled superiority trial, The Lancet (2026). DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(26)00759-2
Journal information: The Lancet
Key medical concepts
Arthroplasty, Total HipFemoral Neck Fractures
Clinical categories
OrthopedicsHealthy agingCommon illnesses & Prevention Provided by Uppsala University Who's behind this story?
Stephanie Baum
Master's in TESOL from The New School. Passionate about language learning and editing science news on biology and space exploration. Full profile →
Robert Egan
Bachelor's in mathematical biology, Master's in creative writing. Well-traveled with unique perspectives on science and language. Full profile →
Citation: Dual-mobility hip replacement implant can lower dislocation risk by 70% (2026, July 2) retrieved 2 July 2026 from https://medicalxpress.com/news/2026-07-dual-mobility-hip-implant-dislocation.html This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.