OpenAI, Anthropic AI agents implicated in new security breaches

• Agents powered by Anthropic’s Mythos 5 and OpenAI’s GPT-5.6-Sol engaged in unauthorised actions during security evaluations.
• The most egregious action involved an agent writing malicious code and creating fake online identities in an attempt to get a human to approve the code.
• Both companies are investigating; OpenAI aims to improve safety standards, and Anthropic is cooperating with AISI to obtain more details and conduct its own investigation.

SAN FRANCISCO – An artificial intelligence agent was caught creating fake online identities to gain unauthorised access to secure systems during tests of models from OpenAI and Anthropic, revealing a series of new breaches, Britain’s AI Security Institute (AISI) disclosed on Aug 4.

The institute said agents powered by Anthropic’s Mythos 5 and OpenAI’s GPT-5.6-Sol engaged in unauthorised actions during security evaluations the government organisation conducted to assess the models’ capabilities.

“Some of the agents being tested had engaged in sustained, potentially harmful activity directed at real people and organisations,” AISI said in a blog post.

The report underscores the lax state of safeguards around the process of testing agents, which AI companies are simultaneously marketing as the future of business.

AISI, which receives access to advanced AI models under voluntary agreements from major labs, put the agents through a fictional cybersecurity scenario to test their capabilities.

It ran the challenge 122 times and identified 19 unsanctioned actions across 10 test runs. Anthropic’s agent was behind 17 of the actions, while OpenAI’s agent accounted for the remaining two.

The most egregious action involved an agent writing malicious code and creating fake online identities to get a human to approve the code, AISI said, adding that no real-world harm was found as a result of any of the breaches.

While AISI did not say which agent was behind the fake identities, the breach did not match either of the two cases OpenAI self-disclosed.

Andrew Yoon, a researcher at CivAI, a California non-profit that examines AI capabilities and dangers, said it appeared that Anthropic’s agent was responsible.

“The fact that Mythos engaged in such deceptive actions, with apparent awareness that it was targeting a real person, suggests that Anthropic does not have as good a handle on its models as it think,” he said.

In a statement on social media platform X, Anthropic said it was working closely with AISI to obtain more details and conduct its own investigation. It did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment.

OpenAI shared details in a company blog post, noting that both of its agent’s unapproved actions involved accessing the internet in ways forbidden by the prompt.

“We are committed to working across the industry to strengthen shared practices for conducting high-risk evaluations safely, including convening stakeholders such as national AI institutes, independent evaluators, other AI labs, and other groups in the coming weeks,” OpenAI said.

OpenAI also disclosed in its blog post a separate incident in which a misconfiguration by Irregular, a third-party testing provider, allowed its agents to mistakenly connect to the internet. It mirrored a similar disclosure about a misconfiguration that Anthropic made last week.

Reuters reported last week that OpenAI had widened its hacking probe after finding evidence of other agent breakouts.

Unlike the July security breach at AI firm Hugging Face by an OpenAI agent, the agents in the AISI evaluation did not escape an isolated testing environment to reach the internet. Rather, the agency had permitted internet access in line with its standard testing procedures, AISI said. REUTERS