Probe Agency Goes To Top Court Against Quashing Of NewsClick Case

In its plea, the ED has argued that the High Court junked the Enforcement Case Information Report (ECIR) without examining the merits of the money-laundering case under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA).

26 Oct 2026, 10:59 · NDTV

Show
Quick Read
Summary is AI-generated, newsroom-reviewed

Probe agency ED challenged Delhi High Court order quashing case against NewsClick on foreign fund violations
It argued court wrongly dismissed its report without examining money laundering merits
Agency claimed court misapplied legal test by requiring incriminating material at investigation stage

What happens to NewsClick while the Supreme Court decides?
New Delhi:

The Enforcement Directorate has approached the Supreme Court challenging the Delhi High Court's May 29, 2026, decision quashing the police case and money-laundering proceedings against news portal NewsClick over alleged violations involving foreign funds.

In its plea, the ED has argued that the High Court junked the Enforcement Case Information Report (ECIR) without examining the merits of the money-laundering case under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA).

Probe Agency Opposes High Court Decision

The ED has challenged the High Court's finding that no incriminating material had emerged despite the investigation continuing for around a year and a half.

According to the agency, the High Court applied the wrong legal test while quashing the proceedings at the investigation stage.

READ | 'Abuse Of Law': Delhi High Court Cancels Probe Agency ED's Cases Against NewsClick

The ED has argued that, at this stage, the court is required to examine the allegations and not determine whether incriminating material has been found.

The agency has further submitted that the investigation could not be completed because the High Court had, in June, 2021, ordered that no coercive action be taken against the respondents.

It has claimed that its applications seeking clarification and vacation of the stay remained pending for around three years, effectively restricting its ability to fully investigate the case.

'High Court Ignored Material Evidence'

The agency has also alleged that the High Court failed to consider evidence and incriminating material placed on record by the ED.

In its plea, the ED has referred to alleged discrepancies surrounding foreign investments received by PPK Newsclick Studio Private Limited, including an agreement with Worldwide Media Holdings LLC for an investment of $1.5 million in three tranches.

The agency has claimed that only one tranche was received as foreign direct investment and has questioned the circumstances in which the company received foreign funds.

The ED has also cited the company's financial records, email communications concerning the incorporation of Worldwide Media Holdings LLC, and statements recorded during the investigation.

READ | "Arrest Void": Supreme Court Orders Immediate Release Of NewsClick Founder

It has further challenged the High Court's conclusion that the allegations did not disclose the offences of cheating and criminal conspiracy.

The agency has argued that cheating is not limited to cases where a person is directly deprived of property. It has submitted that the offence can also involve intentionally inducing a person to act, or refrain from acting, in a manner that causes or is likely to cause harm to their body, mind, reputation or property.

Probe Agency Says Police Case Not 'Encyclopedia'

The agency has also relied on Supreme Court judgments to argue that a police case need not contain every detail of the alleged offence.

According to the ED, the relevant test is whether the information in the case provides a reason to suspect the commission of an offence. The agency has argued that the allegations and the material gathered during the investigation warranted further proceedings.

What Probe Agency Said On High Court Decision

The ED has also challenged the High Court's decision to junk the ECIR, arguing that it is an internal document and is not equivalent to a case registered by the police.

The agency has further submitted that junking an ECIR does not, by itself, bring an investigation under the PMLA to an end.

It has also argued that the High Court exceeded its jurisdiction by examining disputed questions of fact while exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Got a follow‑up question on this article? Go on

How may i help you today

Show full article

Track Latest News Live on NDTV.com and get news updates from India and around the world