Ex-investigation officer who took statements over the phone gets jail for forgery
The defence said the investigation officer was experiencing grief from his father's sudden death, compounded by accumulated case backlogs and mounting work pressures.
by Lydia Lam · CNA · JoinRead a summary of this article on FAST.
Get bite-sized news via a new
cards interface. Give it a try.
Click here to return to FAST Tap here to return to FAST
FAST
SINGAPORE: A former investigation officer (IO) with the Singapore Police Force (SPF) was sentenced to more than nine months' jail on Tuesday (May 12) for forging statements from accused persons, victims and witnesses.
At the time, he was suffering from prolonged grief disorder and major depressive disorder following his father's sudden death, the defence said.
S Vikneshvaran Subramaniam, a 36-year-old Singaporean, pleaded guilty to four counts of forgery, with another five charges taken into consideration.
The offences spanned about one-and-a-half years from June 2021 to February 2023, pertaining to seven case files Vikneshvaran took on as an investigation officer.
SPF said in May 2025 that Vikneshvaran had been suspended, and that he had been placed under enhanced supervision in October 2022 due to his work performance.
A supervisory check of his work was conducted and irregularities were detected, leading to the discovery of the offences.
When the forgeries were detected, the affected cases were re-investigated with the final case outcomes unaffected by the forgeries.
THE CASE
Vikneshvaran was posted to the investigation branch at Jurong Division in August 2019.
As an IO, he recorded statements from accused persons and witnesses and handled seized items.
As part of his job, he would have to handle the return of seized property to the rightful owners pursuant to court orders after cases conclude, and the recipient would have to sign a form as an acknowledgement.
In January 2023, Vikneshvaran's officer-in-charge conducted a check on his desk and found a duffel bag containing case exhibits.
A chief investigation officer was subsequently tasked with reviewing all of the cases Vikneshvaran had handled during his entire stint as an investigation officer.
Other IOs were tasked to take over and review his ongoing cases.
Vikneshvaran was found to have forged two acknowledgement forms for two exhibits he still had.
He had also forged four statements from accused persons and three statements from victims or witnesses across five case files that were undergoing investigations.
The affected cases were re-investigated and fresh statements were taken, with the case outcomes ultimately unaffected by the forgeries.
One of the cases involved a man who was found to have another man's NRIC on him. A court order was issued for the card to be returned to the rightful owner when the case concluded in March 2022.
The owner told Vikneshvaran that he had made a replacement card and did not want the old one back.
Vikneshvaran signed an acknowledgement form on the owner's behalf, making it seem like the latter had received the NRIC. This way, Vikneshvaran did not have to apply for a fresh court order for the card to be disposed of.
The card was later found in the duffel bag at Vikneshvaran's desk.
In another case, Vikneshvaran called a victim and interviewed her over the phone for a statement that was purportedly recorded at the police station. This document was unsigned.
Vikneshvaran also called an accused person over the phone and used the information for a statement that he forged with the person's signature.
SENTENCING ARGUMENTS
The prosecution called for nine to 10-and-a-half months' jail, emphasising the need for general deterrence.
Defence lawyer Gino Hardial Singh of Abbots Chambers sought five to six months' jail instead.
Mr Singh said his client was suffering from prolonged grief disorder and major depressive disorder at the time.
He cited a report from the Institute of Mental Health stating that there was a contributory link between the mental disorders and some of the charges, arising through a moderate degree of impairment in self-control.
Mr Singh said that following the sudden death of Vikneshvaran's father, he experienced "sustained grief, guilt and psychological distress" which was compounded by mounting work pressures and accumulated case backlogs.
The lawyer said the offences are serious, but stressed that Vikneshvaran did not commit the offences for financial gain.
In sentencing, District Judge Ng Cheng Thiam cited the case of S Iswaran, where then-Justice Vincent Hoong said that trust and confidence in public institutions are the "bedrock of effective governance", which can all too easily be undermined by the appearance that an individual public servant has fallen below the standards of integrity and accountability.
"The Singapore Police Force is one such public institution where honesty, vigilance and integrity are of utmost importance in maintaining public trust and proper administration of criminal justice," said Judge Ng.
He said all police officers and law enforcement officers are supposed to uphold the law and catch offenders who break it.
"When a police officer breaks the law and becomes a criminal offender himself, he has tarnished the reputation of the SPF and also put a stain on the integrity of the law enforcement and criminal justice process," said the judge.
"Such an offender cannot expect leniency from the courts when being sentenced," he said, adding that a message must be sent to remind all police officers and law enforcement officers that the public expects them to carry out their roles, duties and responsibilities with "complete integrity".
Vikneshvaran was given 42 weeks' jail. When a prison sentence is imposed in weeks, CNA reports the sentences as spelt out by the court as months vary in length.
SPF previously said in a statement that it has a system of regular audits of cases to ensure that the investigation process is fair and robust.
Supervisors are immediately alerted when lapses are detected, and they also pay closer attention to officers who show signs of underperformance.
"If any irregularity is discovered, internal investigations are swiftly conducted, and documents relating to all the cases which the errant officers were investigating will be reviewed," said SPF.
It added that it takes "a very serious view of law enforcement officers who contravene our laws and will take swift and decisive action to protect the integrity of our criminal justice system".
For each charge of forgery, Vikneshvaran could have been jailed for up to four years, fined, or both.
Sign up for our newsletters
Get our pick of top stories and thought-provoking articles in your inbox
Get the CNA app
Stay updated with notifications for breaking news and our best stories
Get WhatsApp alerts
Join our channel for the top reads for the day on your preferred chat app