The Remake of the End of the Greatest RPG of All Time review: Escaping nostalgia
Nostalgia, game development, and meta storytelling collide in this RPG-themed deduction game.
by Lucas White · ShacknewsWhat if an RPG wasn’t an RPG at all, rather, something entirely different? That’s kind of what’s happening with Coin Drop Games’ awkwardly-titled The Remake of the End of the Greatest RPG of All Time. It’s a deduction game about a pair of developers in way over their heads, trying to remake a beloved Super Nintendo game from their childhood. By playing both in and outside of the project, we see their struggles and disagreements, conflict with fans, and an earnest (albeit narratively muddy) look at how nostalgia can shape creative endeavors for both better and worse.
This is not the greatest RPG in the world - this is just a tribute
After reuniting in college, a pair of childhood friends decide to get together and create a remake of what they call The Greatest RPG of All Time. The pair hold a deep reverence for this game, which conveniently evokes the likes of Chrono Trigger, but they don’t necessarily agree on what constitutes a good remake. Do they “fix” the imperfections that helped define this experience in their minds and try to make it better, or do they commit to the original vision? Do they add anything based on their tattered, old instruction manual full of childhood notes? Who is this Darkhart character, and why does he seem to stand out so much among the party? Before they can get too deep into these questions, the game project is compromised by an outsider, an apparent troll who is so upset at the prospect of this remake they’re going out of their way to steal the files and upload their own version to Steam for purchase. But with the ownership rights being so murky, there’s only so much the pair can do.
So what now? You are some combination of cosmic digital presence and/or a player (it’s unclear), and you’ve stumbled upon both this game and the underlying drama at the same time. By engaging with this remake of The Greatest RPG of All Time, you’re in a position to confront the conflict as well, and take a side. Or something. It’s pretty fumbly, to be honest, and while I give points to the creators for aiming high at this metanarrative mishmash of ideals versus outcomes, internal and external conflicts, and nostalgia versus descriptive reality, the connective tissue is as dense as a pack of Red Vines and the whole thing is kind of confusing as a result. It’s hard to determine what The Point is by the end, other than a pile of earnest platitudes arranged like a stack of beloved video games on a shelf.
We’re doing the meta thing again
The problem is the gameplay and the story being told don’t really feel of a kind. You do stuff in the game, then you do stuff in a sort of liminal space outside of the game that’s still seemingly separate from real life, and the things you uncover in either space help you get further in each. Meanwhile, the story kind of nudges you along, but is presented as more of a reward for your work than something you’re really interacting with directly until the end, when things get kind of… pretentious, to be frank. It’s like an elaborate escape room, a comparison I can’t take credit for but as soon as I heard it, everything fell into place in my mind. The experience is officially described as a “deduction game,” which is more or less the same thing.
In the “game,” you control your classic RPG-style characters, explore a 2.5D environment, and sort of engage with scripted combat sequences. You’re also finding clues in the form of pages from an old, torn-up instruction manual, which help you navigate the glitchy, obtuse barriers plaguing this troubled software. You also find clues to use outside, which in turn reveal more about what’s going on with the actual game development and conflict with the internet troll-like outsider trying to sabotage the project. It’s very escape room-like, in that you’ll run into hard stops requiring you to uncover the proper hint or piece of information you need to progress. Without each piece, there’s no way to go forward unless you guess or get lucky. It’s like a real-life escape room challenge, in which you often are dealing with hidden codes to unlock boxes containing more clues, to unlock more boxes, so on and so forth.
This structure can oscillate wildly between fun and annoying, depending on how each clue comes across your lap. Some hints are more intuitive and readable than others, and others require you to grok specific information the correct way, which will vary depending on the person. It depends on how you can interpret language, graphs or diagrams in some cases, and other hints that leverage different kinds of contexts. I’m being a bit vague, but that’s the nature of a game like this. Things will click right away or they won’t, and you either thrive in that environment or you don’t. I mostly had a good time, but one piece I really didn’t vibe with was combat.
Combat? Yeah, sure buddy
Being an “RPG,” of course there’s something resembling a combat system in this experience. But it isn’t really combat, so much as a layer of puzzles built to resemble combat in an old-school RPG. They’re pass/fail puzzles like everything else, but are structured like turn-based battles somewhat resembling Chrono Cross. These devs love them some Chrono. Anyway, there’s an illusion of choice and expression in these moments that frustrated the piss out of me by their very existence. An illusion meant to produce verisimilitude, but with an outcome more like being forced to step on a rake over and over. There are right and wrong answers, and you either do damage or you don’t. And sometimes you have to burn turns to get information you need, meaning you have to sit there and watch your characters flail around haplessly so you can take your notes and do the thing the game wants. It’s excruciating to sit through, and the whole ending sequence is a combat gauntlet that doubles as an open note quiz. Yuck!
I respect what The Remake of the End of the Greatest RPG of All Time was going for, and found its ambition and earnestness commendable despite some hammy acting in its live action scenes. I even had fun solving and putting together most of the puzzles. There’s a lot of dead air, backtracking, and time wasting that grated on me towards the end though, reminding me why escape rooms are largely designed in confined spaces and don’t involve a ton of repetition. Trying to fold RPG design structure into an escape room-like puzzle contraption was an intriguing premise, but frustrating to deal with when these two affectations intersected awkwardly. The message this story is trying to convey is also kind of clumsy, which both adds and detracts from the charm in some ways. I will say, however, that this is my favorite game in which the villain sadly caresses a Death Stranding 2 poster at GDC.
The Remake of the End of the Greatest RPG of All Time is available on May 28, 2026 for PC. A code was provided by the publisher for this review.
Shacknews staff does not use generative artificial intelligence (AI) in their content. Shacknews strictly prohibits the use of its content for AI training or to generate text, including text in the style or format used for this publication. Shacknews reserves all rights to this work.
Review for
The Remake of the End of the Greatest RPG of All Time
6
Pros
- An escape room/old-school RPG hybrid is an intriguing premise
- A certain charm and earnestness that helps carry the story
- Real life footage involves game development spaces in fun ways
Cons
- Clumsy storytelling hold the overall big picture back
- Combat is super annoying
- Some puzzles feel poorly communicated