MEPs force EU parliament’s hand on long-stalled ethics body
· EUobserverThe S&D-drafted amendment buried in a key budget report passed by a razor-thin margin, with 296 votes in favour to 292 against, even as the plenary shot down broader pro-transparency proposals
MEPs force EU parliament’s hand on long-stalled ethics body
Unlock article and share
By Nikolaj Nielsen,
The European Parliament has greenlit the possible launch of a new ethics oversight body, securing just enough votes in a tightly-contested plenary session.
The socialist-drafted amendment buried in a key budget report passed by a razor-thin margin on Wednesday (29 April) — with 296 votes in favour to 292 against, even as the plenary shot down broader pro-transparency proposals.
Far-right and centre-right factions have long resisted creating such a body, raising questions about how the vote squeaked through.
MEPs voted under a provision shielding their names from public record, fuelling speculation that some centre-right members from the European People’s Party may have broken ranks with their party’s own stance.
A rival amendment from the liberal Renew Europe group sought the same outcome but required a public roll-call vote exposing MEP identities.
It was decisively rejected.
Yet even with the S&D amendment’s passage, mandating the European Parliament to launch it only after a two-year delay, its actual establishment remains far from certain. The amendment demanded that parliament comply without any further delay.
“We hope that this will mean that finally, something will will move,” said Shari Hinds at the Brussels-office of Transparency International.
The body is designed to set minimum ethics standards across eight different EU institutions, including the European Parliament.
The EU agreed in May 2024 to set up the watchdog but crucially, it would have no investigative powers or ability to sanction any wrongdoing.
Even after being stripped of any real powers, the ethics body has faced consistent opposition from the centre-right European People’s Party (EPP), which torpedoed moves last year to integrate the assembly into its fold.
That position was echoed earlier this week by Romania’s Loránt Vincze from the EPP, who said the European Parliament has no intention of fully cooperating with the ethics body, arguing that such probes need to remain in-house.
To read this story, log in or subscribe
Enjoy access to all articles and 25 years of archives, comment and gift articles. Become a member for as low as €1,75 per week.
Become a member
Already a member? Login
Unlock article and share
Latest from European Parliament
Parliament’s €2 trillion budget push includes help for some of Europe’s embattled NGOs
Patriots for Europe secretary-general under new scrutiny for alleged EU funds misuse
Latest from far-right
Orbán’s fall does not mean the end for Europe’s far-right think-tanks and financing
Why Europe must call out the far-right’s defence bluff
Latest from Transparency
Secrecy tracker: Data centre secrecy and top EU court database ‘disaster’
Secrecy Tracker: Transparency battles shaping the EU in 2026
Latest from EU politics
Time to agree a Europe-wide legal definition for rape, MEPs say
Malta’s notorious gambling laws ‘incompatible’ with single market: EU court top lawyer
The S&D-drafted amendment buried in a key budget report passed by a razor-thin margin, with 296 votes in favour to 292 against, even as the plenary shot down broader pro-transparency proposals
Topics
Author Bio
Nikolaj Nielsen joined EUobserver in 2012 and covers home affairs. He is originally from Denmark, but spent much of his life in France and in Belgium. He was awarded the King Baudouin Foundation grant for investigative journalism in 2010.