Leather excluded from deforestation law, but EU defies Trump call for US exemption

· EUobserver

Coffee-producing countries are among those to report the biggest problems meeting the due diligence rules set in the EU’s new deforestation law (Photo: Taylor Flowe)

EU and the World

Leather excluded from deforestation law, but EU defies Trump call for US exemption

Unlock article and share
By Benjamin Fox,
Nairobi
,

Leather imports will now be excluded from the scope of the EU’s anti-deforestation law, as part of a review aimed at simplifying the regulation published by the EU Commission on Monday (4 May) — but Brussels has defied demands by the US Trump administration to give US firms a blanket exemption from the law. 

Last month, a US government and industry delegation toured European capitals to push for the EU to introduce a ‘no-risk’ category to the country benchmarks in the law.

The ‘no risk’ category was proposed by rightwing MEPs back in 2024 but rejected by EU governments. 

But the commission has shied away from a re-write of the regulation and defied the heavy lobbying by the Trump administration. 

However, it has exempted leather imports from the law’s scope after concluding that production of skins and hides does not incentivise the cattle farming that fuels forest destruction. 

“The main driver of deforestation is the expansion of agricultural land ‌linked ⁠to the production of seven commodities covered by the regulation – cattle, wood, cocoa, soy, palm oil, coffee, rubber, and some of their derived products,” ⁠said the commission in a statement.

The limited changes to the law have reassured environmental activists who had feared that the review would be used to further unpick the law’s provisions. 

Meanwhile, industry players in the cocoa and coffee sectors have complained that they have invested heavily in meeting the due diligence rules. 

Coffee giants unite

A group of coffee industry giants, including JDE Peet’s, Tchibo, Louis Dreyfus Company, Neumann Kaffee Group, Touton and Sucafina, have teamed up in a Coffee Canopy Partnership to use high-resolution satellite imagery from Airbus to produce detailed maps of coffee-growing areas across Ethiopia, Tanzania, Kenya, Uganda, Burundi and Rwanda, in order to meet the traceability standards. 

“What we need now is decisive implementation, clear enforcement, and the political will to stand by the commitments already made,” said Anke Schulmeister‑Oldenhove of the environmental NGO, WWF. 

“Delays and half-baked amendments have already come at a tangible cost for businesses and nature,” said Schulmeister‑Oldenhove. 

The commission’s review proposed several exclusions from the scope, such as leather or retreaded tyres. Elsewhere, it plans to add instant coffee and palm oil derivatives. 

To read this story, log in or subscribe

Enjoy access to all articles and 25 years of archives, comment and gift articles. Become a member for as low as €1,75 per week.

Become a member
Already a member? Login
Unlock article and share

Latest from Africa

Europe wants Africa’s minerals. Africa should make it pay

MEPs vote to slap tariffs on countries that refuse to take back migrants

Latest from Deforestation

EU urged to face down pressure to reopen deforestation law amid review

Cocoa price slumps, despite EU deforestation law

Latest from Economy

100 million disabled Europeans are worried about the EU budget — here’s why 

This WEEK: MEPs decide on next EU budget, as ECB responds to Iran war 

Latest from US

Europe’s brutal awakening – the costs of its inaction in the Middle East

US troop cuts in Europe risk inspiring Russian aggression

Latest from EU and the World

EU rebukes Israel over advance beyond Gaza ceasefire line

Russians prepare for 9 May air-war over Moscow, with Fico to watch (Ukraine Battlefield update, Day 1,530)

Coffee-producing countries are among those to report the biggest problems meeting the due diligence rules set in the EU’s new deforestation law (Photo: Taylor Flowe)

Topics

Author Bio

Benjamin Fox is our trade and geopolitics editor. His reporting has also been published in the Guardian, the East African, Euractiv, Private Eye and Africa Confidential, among others. He is based in Nairobi, Kenya, although he often reports from London.