Global musicians face the same 'streaming paradox' as US- and UK-based artists, study finds

Sadie Harley

scientific editor

Meet our editorial team
Behind our editorial process

Andrew Zinin

lead editor

Meet our editorial team
Behind our editorial process
Editors' notes

This article has been reviewed according to Science X's editorial process and policies. Editors have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility:

fact-checked

trusted source

proofread

The GIST
Add as preferred source

Musicians around the world agree on one thing: streaming platforms are essential for their careers. Most also agree on another: they don't pay enough. A new report from the Oxford Internet Institute and the University of Groningen captures this contradiction across five countries—Brazil, Chile, the Netherlands, Nigeria and South Korea.

Based on a survey of c. 1,200 musicians, the study finds that artists feel trapped in what researchers call a "streaming paradox": visibility has never been easier thanks to streaming, but meaningful income remains out of reach. Meanwhile, musicians say they face growing pressure to become content creators and audience managers, constantly posting, engaging and promoting, just to be seen.

Yet the study's most striking finding is how differently musicians in different countries experience these same pressures. In Nigeria, 83% of musicians said their careers had improved since streaming. In the Netherlands, just 14% said the same.

There are also interesting differences between genres and generations. These differences suggest that culture, expectations, and economic context shape how artists navigate the platform era in fundamentally different ways.

Streaming income: Key findings

• 77% of musicians surveyed earn less than €10,000 a year from music, and 83% are dissatisfied with the royalties they receive from streaming.

• 81% say streaming is important for their career—yet fewer than half say their situation has improved since streaming became dominant.

• Low-income musicians are the most likely to call streaming "extremely important" (55%), while higher earners are more likely to say it's "not that important."

• Almost a quarter of musicians (23%) spend more than half of all their working time on tasks like updating social media, planning tours or communicating with fans—rising to 30% in Chile.

• 69% of respondents said they now spend more time promoting their music online than they did a few years ago.

• 89% of musicians said they do not use AI or automation tools when interacting with fans online.

• Of the five countries surveyed, Dutch artists are the most worried about the impact of AI-generated music flooding streaming platforms and competing with human-created art.

"Artists rely on digital platforms to be seen, to grow their audiences, and to stay relevant. Our report shows that while streaming and social media contribute very little to artists' actual income, the work they require is changing what it means to be a musician. These changes generate different reactions in different countries around the world," said Dr. Robert Prey, Associate Professor of Digital Culture at the Oxford Internet Institute and co-author of the report.

More information

Report: Femke de Rijk and Dr. Robert Prey, Musicians at Work in the Platform and AI Era

Provided by University of Oxford