Nkosazana Daughter sues MacG for R13m over Master KG baby claims
SOUTH AFRICA – Controversial podcast host MacG could soon find himself in financially dire straits, after singer Nkosazana Daughter instituted legal proceedings against him for his claim that Master KG is the biological father of her child.
· Nehanda RadioIn July, MacG reignited the rumour that Master KG and not Sir Trill, was the true father to the songbird’s child.
“Someone in Botswana told me and they are very close to Nkosazana Daughter. Apparently that’s not Sir Trill’s kid, it’s Master KG’s kid, bro. I kid you not,” MacG said.
MacG’s Co-host, Sol Phenduka added fuel to the fire by suggesting that these paternity issues might have caused a rift between Sir Trill and the singer.
In the lawsuit, Nkosazana Daughter’s legal representatives said that the duo’s statements sought to portray her as a person of ill repute.
Related Articles
Berita Khumalo’s ex Nota Baloyi released on R5000 bail,…
Oct 10, 2024 35,926
Furious Nkosazana Daughter denies having child with producer…
Jul 19, 2024 36,006
Master KG rubbishes romance rumours: I take Nkosazana…
Jun 9, 2024 21,461
DJ Maphorisa hits back at MacG as feud escalates after…
Feb 9, 2024 31,456 Prev Next 1 of 2
“(They claimed) the plaintiff was rumoured to have been quarrelling with her partner, one Mr Tumelo Mzwake Zwane (‘Mr Zwane’) as a consequence of the illicit affair with Master KG.
“The minor child of the plaintiff is not born of her relationship with Zwane, but rather a minor child born of the illicit affair between the plaintiff and Master KG.
“Apart from the defamatory meaning of the claims as set out above, the statements carry the additional sting that the plaintiff is deceitful, promiscuous, unprincipled, untrustworthy, adulterous and a liar, and a person without a moral fibre or valuable principles, and who generally conducts herself in an unethical and/or unprofessional manner,” read the papers.
The legal reps demanded an apology and a payment of R13 million for the distress that MacG and his sidekicks had caused the singer.
“An oral, televised and written apology issued by the first and/or second and/or third defendant to the plaintiff.
“Payment by the first and/or second and/or third defendant, whether jointly; alternatively, whether jointly and severally (in which event the one paying, the other two to be absolved), of the aggregate amount of R13 000 000”, read the papers.