Drake Sues UMG for Defamation, Harassment Over Kendrick Lamar’s ‘Not Like Us’
· Rolling StoneDrake has formalized his contentious battle against Kendrick Lamar‘s diss track “Not Like Us” by going after Universal Music Group, filing a defamation and harassment lawsuit against the major music conglomerate on Wednesday.
The Canadian-born rapper, whose real name is Aubrey Drake Graham, claims UMG “unleashed every weapon in its arsenal” in the company’s campaign to turn the diss-track into a “viral hit,” according to the 81-page complaint obtained by Rolling Stone. Drake claims the song itself was “intended to convey the specific, unmistakable, and false factual allegation that Drake is a criminal pedophile.”
Notably, Drake is not suing Lamar over the song and its lyrics, clarifying that the lawsuit “is not about the artist who created “Not Like Us.” Instead, he claims taking legal action is “entirely about UMG, the music company that decided to publish, promote, exploit, and monetize allegations that it understood were not only false, but dangerous.”
“As UMG knows and has known at all relevant times, the Recording, Image, and Video’s allegations are unequivocally false,” the court papers continue. “Drake is not a pedophile. Drake has never engaged in any acts that would require he be ‘placed on neighborhood watch.’ Drake has never engaged in sexual relations with a minor. Drake has never been charged with, or convicted of, any criminal acts whatsoever.”
Drake claims UMG defamed him by waging an “unrelenting campaign” to boost the song and its false statements because “it understood that the Recording’s inflammatory and shocking allegations were a gold mine.” (Rolling Stone has contacted Drake’s attorneys for further comment.)
Representatives for UMG did not immediately respond to Rolling Stone’s request for comment. In a previous statement, a spokesperson denied Drake’s allegations, “The suggestion that UMG would do anything to undermine any of its artists is offensive and untrue. We employ the highest ethical practices in our marketing and promotional campaigns. No amount of contrived and absurd legal arguments in this pre-action submission can mask the fact that fans choose the music they want to hear.”
Editor’s picks
The 100 Best TV Episodes of All Time
The 250 Greatest Guitarists of All Time
The 500 Greatest Albums of All Time
The 200 Greatest Singers of All Time
The two A-list rappers have been duking it out since spring 2024, taking sly swipes at one another in various tracks. However, things erupted into a full-blown lyrical war when Drake released “Family Matters” in May, insinuating that Lamar had cheated on his fiancée and was physically violent with her. Lamar immediately responded with the back-to-back drops of “Meet the Grahams” and “Not Like Us,” with the latter’s hook of “Certified Lover Boy, certified pedophile” becoming an instant slam dunk in their feud.
In addition to the song’s lyrics, Drake took offense to the song’s cover art, which shows a satellite view of his Toronto mansion, filled with red markers that are presumably meant to represent registered sex offenders living at the address. Identifying where Drake lived and accusing him of being a pedophile was the “2024 equivalent of Pizzagate,” the lawsuit claims.
After the song’s release, Drake claims there were three separate intruder incidents at his home, including a break-in attempt and someone open firing at the property, injuring his security guard. “These events were not coincidental,” the lawsuit claims. “UMG’s greed yielded real world consequences.”
Drake is represented by attorney Michael J. Gottlieb, who notably represented Washington D.C. pizza shop owner James Alefantis, whose store was targeted by a Pizzagate conspiracy theorist who opened fire in the shop in December 2016.
The lawsuit comes a day after Drake’s company Frozen Moments voluntarily withdrew his pre-action filings against UMG and Spotify from November in favor of the new federal filing. Drake originally attempted to rope in Spotify in his forthcoming legal battle, accusing UMG of enacting a “scheme” to use bots and payola to boost the song on radio and streaming services. Spotify, meanwhile, was “recommend[ing]” the song to users and/or allowing bots to “artificially inflate” the song’s streams, Drake claimed in court filings.