How Peggy Guggenheim Shaped the Modern Arts Movement
by Tonya Blazio-Licorish · WWD- Share this article on Facebook
- Share this article on X
- Share this article on Pin It
- Share this article on Tumblr
- Share this article on Reddit
- Share this article on LinkedIn
- Share this article on WhatsApp
- Share this article on Email
- Print this article
- Share this article on Talk
- Share this article on Facebook
- Share this article on X
- Share this article on Pin It
- Share this article on Tumblr
- Share this article on Reddit
- Share this article on LinkedIn
- Share this article on WhatsApp
- Share this article on Email
- Print this article
- Share this article on Talk
Legendary art patron Peggy Guggenheim, whose Palazzo Venier dei Leoni home in Venice remains a living museum, once told WWD that “in art there is always a new movement waiting to be born.”
Peggy, as WWD referred to her, remains one of the 20th century’s most prolific collectors. An original in her own right, she advised, critiqued, collected and befriended many of the century’s greatest artists. Her early travels in the 1920s and 1930s blurred the lines between escapism and art acquisition.
Related Articles
Agatha Relota Luczo Shares Delectable Recipes Made With Extra Virgin Olive Oil Sourced From Her Farm
The Meditative Quality of Nancy Cadogan's Artwork
In 1979, she told WWD that she couldn’t afford the Renaissance paintings she preferred, so she turned to lesser-known modern artists. Tutoring from painter Marcel Duchamp led to the opening of Jeune, her first gallery, in London in 1938. There, she introduced a reluctant audience to Henry Moore, Brancusi, Calder and Kandinsky.
You May Also Like
Three years later, she opened the landmark gallery Art of This Century in New York. It was there that she helped launch the career of American modernist Jackson Pollock, playing a pivotal role in the development of the Abstract Expressionist movement and shifting the center of visual art from Europe to America.
While she was never shy about how she amassed her collection, her insistence that “I like it or I don’t like it, but I can’t explain it” offers a simple affirmation that collecting need not be governed by economics, but by the passions one chooses to live with.