I tried to replace Spotify with YouTube Music (again), and it's still missing one crucial thing

24 Dec 2025, 13:00 by Ben Khalesi · Android Police

The cycle begins every year the same way.

A notification pops up on my phone. $12 was taken from my checking account for Spotify Premium. I look at it, frown, and do the mental arithmetic.

I am already paying $14 a month for YouTube Premium. Included in that is a full subscription to YouTube Music. The math feels like a slap in the face.

I’m shelling out $144 a year for Spotify when I have YouTube Music for basically free.

Ideally, I should cancel Spotify and move my playlists over. So, I do it. I start the annual migration. I tell myself that this time, things will be different.

So I deleted Spotify, and then, three weeks later, I was back.

I finally started using YouTube Music and I should have sooner

Seriously, get on YouTube Music

Posts 44
By Parth Shah

Separating YouTube and YouTube Music is a pain

If we’re trying to trace where my frustration with YouTube Music really begins, we have to start at the root cause. The biggest mistake is the shared like button.

In the world of music apps — Spotify, Apple Music, Tidal — the like (or plus, or heart) is how you curate your music.

In the world of videos — YouTube, TikTok, Instagram — the like says, I enjoyed this quick distraction. Keep showing me more like it.

In its push for a unified ecosystem, Google mashed these two concepts into one.

The other day, I was scrolling through YouTube when I found this anime fight montage. I tapped the like to show some love to the creator.

The next morning, I got in my car and opened YouTube Music. Out of nowhere, that anime remix started playing.

When I liked that video on YouTube, I didn’t realize it would end up in my music library. My carefully curated collection was polluted by memes and random content.

Fed up, I looked for a fix and found that you can filter your liked YouTube videos so they don’t pollute your music library. But the bleed happens both ways, and unfortunately, there’s no perfect fix.

My Liked Videos playlist on YouTube is now flooded with hundreds of songs.

The only way to keep things truly separate right now is to use a second account for either YouTube or YouTube Music, and your main account for the other.

Spotify’s audio-first database vs. YouTube’s video-first mess

Spotify uses an audio-first database. A song is a distinct entity with rigid metadata (such as Artist, Album, and Year). It sits in a relational database designed for discographies.

YouTube uses a video-first database. This is why, when you search for a song on YouTube Music, you often see five different versions. The official audio, the music video, the lyric video, a fan upload, and a live version.

On Spotify, there is one canonical track. On YouTube, there are five different videos that all sound like the track.

Managing this mess means a lot of manual work, and the app doesn’t give you the tools to do it easily.

Organizing playlists on YouTube Music is a nightmare

I am a library person. I like folders. I like sorting. I like knowing that if I add an album, it stays there, in the order I placed it.

Spotify, for all its recent UI changes, still respects the concept. I can sort my liked songs by title, artist, album, and more.

YouTube Music treats the Library with active disdain. It wants you in the feed. When you sort a large playlist on YouTube Music, your options are limited to Manual or Newest First/Last.

Want to sort your playlist (which might have 3,000 songs) alphabetically by Artist to find all your David Bowie tracks? You simply can’t. You are expected to move them one by one, like a medieval scribe copying a manuscript.

Even when you accept that the app fights you when you try to organize. Dragging and dropping songs in a playlist on the web interface is buggy.

I have a problem with Samples tab in YouTube Music

Nothing exemplifies the video-first law at the heart of YouTube Music more than the Samples tab.

In 2025, every app wants to be TikTok. X, Reddit, and Instagram all have a vertical, infinite-scroll video feed.

YouTube Music, not wanting to be left out, introduced Samples, occupying prime real estate in the bottom navigation bar.

While Spotify also offers short videos for discovery, it keeps them out of the main navigation.

Subscribe to the newsletter for smart music app tips

Looking for clearer streaming choices? Subscribing to the newsletter gives practical analysis of music apps, step-by-step migration tips, playlist organization strategies, and product comparisons to help you manage your listening library.
Subscribe

Subscribe to the newsletter for smart music app tips

Subscribe
By subscribing, you agree to receive newsletter and marketing emails, and accept Valnet’s Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. You can unsubscribe anytime.

The whole idea behind Samples is discovery. But instead of showing me my usual music, it throws up Japanese shamisen videos.

I guess that’s because I binge-watched some Japanese music for cultural research on YouTube, and now it’s stuck on that.

So if you’re getting into this, I’d recommend a new account since your music profile is already mixed up by all the videos you watch.

YouTube Music has an identity crisis

YouTube Music is not a bad product. If you view it as a feature of YouTube Premium, it is an incredible value.

The catalog is vast. The price is effectively zero if you are already a Premium subscriber.

But as a standalone replacement for Spotify? It fails.

It fails not on content, but on intent. Apps like Spotify and Apple Music are all about building the world’s best audio library. Every feature focuses on what audio listeners need.

YouTube Music, on the other hand, is really just an extension of the YouTube video empire running in the background. Everything is designed around video.

Until Google decides to build a music app that is actually about music, I will keep paying my $12 tribute to Spotify. Keeping a clean library is worth the price of a sandwich every month.