Dishwashing with side effects: Kitchen sponges release microplastics

by

Sadie Harley

scientific editor

Meet our editorial team
Behind our editorial process

Robert Egan

associate editor

Meet our editorial team
Behind our editorial process
Editors' notes

This article has been reviewed according to Science X's editorial process and policies. Editors have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility:

fact-checked

peer-reviewed publication

trusted source

proofread

The GIST
Add as preferred source


Material layers for each sponge type: A) EU-con, B) AM-con, and C) EU-org. Microscopic images of each layer can be found in SM-1A. Credit: Environmental Advances (2026). DOI: 10.1016/j.envadv.2026.100693

Kitchen sponges are considered a potential, yet largely understudied, source of microplastics in households. A study in Environmental Advances investigated how many microplastic particles are released from kitchen sponges during use and what environmental impacts result. The paper is titled "From sink to sea: Microplastic release from kitchen sponges and potential environmental effects."

The aim was to quantify the actual release under realistic usage conditions and to assess the environmental impacts using a life cycle assessment (LCA).

The study combined citizen science—where members of the public actively conduct experiments—with laboratory tests. Volunteer households in Germany and North America used one of three different sponge types in their daily routines and documented their usage.

The sponges were weighed before and after use to determine material loss and microplastic release. In addition, laboratory experiments were carried out using an automated test device ("SpongeBot") that simulates the mechanical stress applied to sponges during dishwashing.

All investigated sponges lose material during use and thereby release microplastics. The annual release ranges from approximately 0.68 to 4.21 grams of microplastics per person per year, depending on the sponge type. Sponges with a lower plastic content release significantly less microplastic.

Overall, however, the analysis showed that it is not the microplastic release itself, but primarily the water consumption during manual dishwashing that contributes most to the environmental impact.

Citizen science played a central role, as volunteer participants used the sponges under real-life conditions. This allowed for the capture of realistic usage patterns and typical dishwashing habits. These data enabled a much more realistic estimation of microplastic release compared to purely laboratory-based studies.

Although the amount per person appears low, when extrapolated to Germany, significant quantities can be reached, for example, up to 355 metric tons of microplastics per year if a specific sponge type is used in every household. While a large proportion of these particles are retained in wastewater treatment plants, several tons still enter aquatic environments or soils annually.

At the same time, the environmental assessment shows that around 85% to 97% of the total environmental impact of dishwashing is attributable to water consumption, while microplastic emissions contribute a much smaller share to overall ecosystem damage.

The study identifies several ways to reduce environmental impact:

  • Use less water when washing dishes, as this has the greatest effect.
  • Choose sponges with lower plastic content to reduce microplastic release.
  • Use sponges for a longer time, as a longer lifespan reduces overall resource consumption.

Publication details

Leandra Hamann et al, From sink to Sea: Microplastic release from kitchen sponges and potential environmental effects, Environmental Advances (2026). DOI: 10.1016/j.envadv.2026.100693

Journal information: Environmental Advances

Key concepts

microplastic contaminationmaterials flow (commodities)

Provided by University of Bonn