New analysis finds geographical differences in access to donor lungs, transplants
· Medical Xpressedited by Stephanie Baum, reviewed by Robert Egan
Stephanie Baum
Scientific Editor
Meet our editorial team
Behind our editorial process
Robert Egan
Associate Editor
Meet our editorial team
Behind our editorial process Editors' notes
This article has been reviewed according to Science X's editorial process and policies. Editors have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility:
fact-checked
peer-reviewed publication
trusted source
proofread
The GIST Add as preferred source
A new study from Cleveland Clinic and Case Western Reserve University has found that geographic location remains an important factor in access to donor lungs in the United States, even after recent updates to the national lung allocation system changed how donor lungs are distributed.
The study, published in CHEST, evaluated early experience under the lung Composite Allocation Score (CAS), a system designed to prioritize transplant candidates based on factors including medical urgency, projected post-transplant survival, and biological compatibility. Researchers also modeled the potential effects of a recent policy amendment that increased the influence of geographic efficiency, giving greater weight to donor-candidate proximity in transplant candidate ranking.
Using national transplant registry data, investigators analyzed 3,917 adult lung transplant candidates at 61 U.S. transplant centers and found substantial regional differences in donor availability, with lower effective donor availability observed in the western United States compared with parts of the Midwest and South.
"Our analysis found that access to donor lungs continues to vary across the country," said Maryam Valapour, M.D., director of lung transplant outcomes at Cleveland Clinic. "The study also found that placing greater emphasis on how close a patient is to a donor hospital may make it harder for some patients to receive compatible donor lungs. This is important because while lung transplants have been increasing, there is still a shortage of organs, and more people are added to the wait list every day."
Researchers measured what they described as "distance-adjusted donor availability," an estimate of the biologically compatible donor pool available to a patient after accounting for donor–candidate distance weighting within the CAS system. The study found that donor availability varied substantially by region, with transplant centers in the West Census region experiencing approximately 30% lower effective donor availability compared with centers in the Midwest.
Researchers then modeled the effects of a newly amended policy that gives greater weight to donor-candidate proximity in transplant candidate ranking. The analysis found that the amended policy would further reduce effective donor availability across all Census regions and widen geographic differences in donor access.
Researchers also performed "match-run" analyses to evaluate how candidate prioritization changed under the amended policy. They found that 23.9% of lung transplant candidates ranked within the top 10 positions under the prior CAS policy fell outside the top 10 under the amended policy, meaning the sickest patients may not be the first to be offered donor lungs, depending on their location.
The study further found that candidates with biological conditions or features that make donor matching difficult, including patients with blood type O, experienced greater de-prioritization under the amended policy.
"Although the national lung allocation system has evolved in recent years, our findings suggest meaningful regional differences in donor access remain," said Jarrod Dalton, Ph.D., director of the Center for Populations Health Research at Cleveland Clinic. "The study also found that changes increasing the importance of geographic proximity may have a greater effect on patients with fewer compatible donor options."
The study used data from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR), which includes information on all donors, waitlisted candidates, and transplant recipients in the United States.
Publication details
Maryam Valapour et al, Geography as a Determinant of Donor Access for Lung Transplantation in the United States, CHEST (2026). DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2026.05.019
Journal information: Chest
Key medical concepts
Clinical categories
Pulmonary medicine Provided by Cleveland Clinic Who's behind this story?
Stephanie Baum
Master's in TESOL from The New School. Passionate about language learning and editing science news on biology and space exploration. Full profile →
Robert Egan
Bachelor's in mathematical biology, Master's in creative writing. Well-traveled with unique perspectives on science and language. Full profile →
Citation: New analysis finds geographical differences in access to donor lungs, transplants (2026, May 30) retrieved 31 May 2026 from https://medicalxpress.com/news/2026-05-analysis-geographical-differences-access-donor.html This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.