Video-assisted informed consent helps reduce decisional conflict in cancer patients
· Medical Xpressedited by Sadie Harley, reviewed by Andrew Zinin
Sadie Harley
Scientific Editor
Meet our editorial team
Behind our editorial process
Andrew Zinin
Chief Editor
Meet our editorial team
Behind our editorial process Editors' notes
This article has been reviewed according to Science X's editorial process and policies. Editors have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility:
fact-checked
trusted source
proofread
The GIST Add to Preferred Sources
For patients undergoing gastric cancer surgery, informed consent (IC) can involve extensive information about surgical methods, complications, risks, benefits and life after treatment. Conventional face-to-face explanations can be difficult to absorb in one sitting and require substantial time from both patients and surgeons. Decisional conflict, the uncertainty people may feel when making a treatment choice, adds to this challenge.
A research team led by Senior Assistant Professor Kazumitsu Suzuki and Professor Susumu Shibasaki from the Department of Surgery, Fujita Health University, Japan, along with their colleagues Associate Professor Yusuke Watanabe, Professor Ichiro Uyama and Professor Koichi Suda from the same institute, addressed this challenge.
In cooperation with Contrea Inc., the team evaluated whether standardized video aids could help patients better understand the relevant information before their surgical consultation.
Sixty patients scheduled for gastrectomy were randomly assigned either to watch video IC aids before their face-to-face consultation (PVIC group) or to receive the face-to-face consultation first and watch the videos afterward (standard IC group). The study was published in the World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.
"Rather than replacing the doctor's explanation, the video was designed to help patients understand essential information before meeting their doctor," said Suzuki. "We wanted patients to understand the surgery at their own pace so the consultation could focus more on their questions and concerns, supporting shared decision-making."
The videos were delivered through a web-based platform in short segments totaling about 30 minutes. They used animations, illustrations and subtitles to explain topics such as surgical procedures, complications, postoperative recovery and reconstruction methods. Surgeons selected appropriate modules for each patient's planned operation, allowing the material to be tailored while maintaining a standardized explanation.
The results showed improved consultation efficiency. Face-to-face IC discussions lasted an average of 22.4 minutes in the PVIC group, compared with 35.9 minutes in the standard IC group, a reduction of about 40%.
The primary outcome, the overall decisional conflict score, tended to be lower in the PVIC group after the consultation, although the difference did not reach statistical significance. The mean score was 13.5 in the PVIC group and 20.5 in the standard group, with P = 0.056. In both groups, decisional conflict decreased after patients received the video and physician explanation.
However, no patients in the preconsultation video group had high decisional conflict after the consultation, compared with 20% in the standard group, a statistically significant difference. These findings suggest that timing may matter: having an opportunity to understand the information through multimedia before the face-to-face discussion may help prevent high levels of uncertainty.
"Patients can watch the videos at home, revisit difficult parts, and share the information with family members before their appointment," said Suzuki. "This could help shift the consultation from simply delivering information toward a more meaningful dialogue between patients and health care professionals."
The researchers emphasize that the videos are not intended to replace conversations with doctors. Because videos provide one-way information, they cannot respond to personal concerns or questions. Instead, the approach could give patients a clearer baseline understanding and allow consultation time to be used for individualized discussion.
In the future, digital tools, potentially including AI, could provide more personalized information and identify patients' questions and priorities before appointments.
Overall, this randomized trial suggests that preconsultation video aids may improve the efficiency of IC for gastric cancer surgery and help prevent high decisional conflict. Further larger-scale evaluations could provide more robust evidence of these effects.
More information
Kazumitsu Suzuki et al., Impact of video-assisted informed consent on decision conflict and consultation time in gastric cancer surgery, World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery (2026). DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.123251
Key medical concepts
Clinical categories
General surgeryOncology Provided by Fujita Health University Who's behind this story?
Sadie Harley
BSc Life Sciences & Ecology. Microbiology lab background with pharmaceutical news experience in oil, gas, and renewable industries. Full profile →
Andrew Zinin
Master's in physics with research experience. Long-time science news enthusiast. Plays key role in Science X's editorial success. Full profile →
Citation: Video-assisted informed consent helps reduce decisional conflict in cancer patients (2026, November 10) retrieved 10 November 2026 from https://medicalxpress.com/news/2026-11-video-consent-decisional-conflict-cancer.html This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.