Nearly 1 in 5 people with sight loss report encountering bogus treatments

· Medical Xpress

by University College London

edited by Sadie Harley, reviewed by Robert Egan

Sadie Harley

Scientific Editor

Meet our editorial team
Behind our editorial process

Robert Egan

Senior Editor

Meet our editorial team
Behind our editorial process Editors' notes

This article has been reviewed according to Science X's editorial process and policies. Editors have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility:

fact-checked

peer-reviewed publication

trusted source

proofread

The GIST Add as preferred source


Credit: Mikhail Nilov from Pexels

An international study of almost 1,000 people living with sight loss, led by University College London (UCL) researchers, found that nearly one in five reported receiving or encountering eye treatments they believed to be "bogus."

The study, published in JAMA Ophthalmology, raises concerns in the eye health community about how patients navigate an increasingly complex environment of health information and commercial treatment claims.

Online ads drove most encounters

The study team, supported by NIHR Biomedical Research Center: Moorfields, surveyed 955 adults with diagnosed eye conditions in the U.K. and U.S. to gauge how often they came across treatments they perceived as lacking sufficient scientific evidence or regulatory credibility, where they encountered them and what influenced their decisions to accept or reject them.

The survey found that 19.1% of participants reported encountering treatments they believed to be bogus. Most chose not to proceed, but about one in four underwent treatment.

Nearly 58% of participants reported seeing online advertising for these treatments. Some, however, first heard about a treatment during an appointment with an eye care professional. Those participants were significantly more likely to undergo treatment than those who encountered online advertising and marketing.

The study was led by professor Mariya Moosajee and Dr. Lee Jones. Jones, a postdoctoral research fellow at the UCL Institute of Ophthalmology and the NIHR Clinical Research Facility, Moorfields Eye Hospital, said, "Our results highlight the importance of clear and evidence-based communication between clinicians and patients as new therapies emerge and online marketing continues to expand across the world.

"Our study is about patient perceptions rather than whether the treatments really were bogus or not. But what we've shown is the importance of helping patients to tell the difference between evidence-based treatments and unsupported company claims."

Treatments ranged from vitamins to stem cells

The treatments reported by participants covered a broad range, including nutritional supplements and vitamins; complementary and alternative therapies such as acupuncture and homeopathy; regenerative therapies, including stem cell treatments; electromagnetic devices; and topical substances.

Almost 80% of the participants who turned down treatment said they did not trust the claims being made. Others reported avoiding treatment after seeking further advice from a health care professional.

For those who underwent treatment, experiences varied considerably. Some people reported spending more than £10,000, while a small number described adverse effects, including worsening vision, increased visual symptoms or other health problems.

The study also found differences between countries. Participants in the U.S. were more likely than those in the U.K. to report encountering these treatments and undergoing them.

Publication details

Patient-Reported Exposure to Potentially Bogus Ophthalmic Treatments, JAMA Ophthalmology (2026). DOI: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2026.4121

Journal information: JAMA Ophthalmology

Key medical concepts

Blindness

Clinical categories

OphthalmologyCommon illnesses & Prevention Provided by University College London Who's behind this story?

Sadie Harley

BSc Life Sciences & Ecology. Microbiology lab background with pharmaceutical news experience in oil, gas, and renewable industries. Full profile →

Robert Egan

Bachelor's in mathematical biology, Master's in creative writing. Well-traveled with unique perspectives on science and language. Full profile →

Citation: Nearly 1 in 5 people with sight loss report encountering bogus treatments (2026, September 24) retrieved 25 September 2026 from https://medicalxpress.com/news/2026-09-people-sight-loss-encountering-bogus.html This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.