Examining political differences in perceptions of vaccine safety and effectiveness

by American Public Health Association

edited by Robert Egan

Robert Egan

Senior Editor

Meet our editorial team
Behind our editorial process
Editors' notes

This article has been reviewed according to Science X's editorial process and policies. Editors have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility:

fact-checked

peer-reviewed publication

proofread

The GIST Add as preferred source

Vaccine perceptions can influence acceptance and uptake. Dr. Dror Walter, with the Department of Communication at Georgia State University in Atlanta, and colleagues examined these perceptions using data from a national probability sample of 1,763 U.S. adults surveyed in November 2024. The study was published online in the American Journal of Public Health on Sept. 10, 2026.

"Previous research examining associations with vaccine hesitancy has primarily measured perceptions of science and scientists in terms of trust. However, analyses of contemporary arguments on vaccine hesitancy suggest that resistance extends beyond mistrust or doubts about scientists' competence," says Walter.

Notably, respondents rated the MMR vaccine as the safest and most effective, while the COVID-19 vaccine received the lowest ratings for both safety and effectiveness. Republicans generally reported less favorable perceptions of vaccine safety and effectiveness than Democrats, particularly for the COVID-19 vaccine. The findings showed that positive views of science and scientists were associated with higher perceived safety and effectiveness of the MMR, flu and COVID-19 vaccines.

Explaining the value of this approach, Walter says, "Our analysis shows that perceiving scientists as unbiased mattered more in Republicans' assessments of the COVID-19 vaccine's effectiveness but less so (compared with Democrats) in the case of the MMR's effectiveness. This difference is likely the result of attacks on the integrity of scientists during the COVID-19 pandemic from the right, as opposed to prepandemic concerns about the MMR vaccine from the left."

Perceiving science as beneficial was the factor most consistently associated with positive vaccine evaluations across all three vaccines. This pattern suggests that communication emphasizing the tangible benefits of science and vaccines may be particularly effective, especially when tailored to audience concerns and political context.

Walter and colleagues conclude that understanding vaccine perceptions may benefit from examining both political affiliation and perceptions of science and scientists. This may offer practical insights for addressing vaccine concerns by guiding tailored communication strategies.

Publication details

The Relationship Between Political Affiliation, Perceptions of Science and Scientists, and Perceived Safety and Effectiveness of the MMR, Flu, and COVID-19 Vaccines: United States, 2024, American Journal of Public Health (2026). DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2026.308606. ajph.aphapublications.org/doi/ … 105/AJPH.2026.308606

Journal information: American Journal of Public Health

Key medical concepts

COVID-19 VaccineMeasles-Mumps-Rubella VaccineInfluenza vaccine

Clinical categories

Preventive medicineCommon illnesses & PreventionInfectious diseases Provided by American Public Health Association Who's behind this story?

Robert Egan

Bachelor's in mathematical biology, Master's in creative writing. Well-traveled with unique perspectives on science and language. Full profile →

Citation: Examining political differences in perceptions of vaccine safety and effectiveness (2026, October 5) retrieved 5 October 2026 from https://medicalxpress.com/news/2026-10-political-differences-perceptions-vaccine-safety.html This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.