New commentary calls for shift to nurse-sensitive outcome measures
· Medical Xpressby University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing
edited by Sadie Harley, reviewed by Andrew Zinin
Sadie Harley
Scientific Editor
Meet our editorial team
Behind our editorial process
Andrew Zinin
Chief Editor
Meet our editorial team
Behind our editorial process Editors' notes
This article has been reviewed according to Science X's editorial process and policies. Editors have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility:
fact-checked
peer-reviewed publication
trusted source
proofread
The GIST Add to Preferred Sources
Current health care metrics fail to capture the true value of acute and critical care nursing, evaluating the profession primarily by the absence of patient harm rather than positive clinical outcomes, according to a commentary in JAMA Internal Medicine.
Martha A.Q. Curley, Ph.D., RN, FAAN, professor in the Department of Family and Community Health and the Ruth M. Colket Endowed Chair in Pediatric Nursing at Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, served as senior author of the commentary, which urges health systems, payers and credentialing bodies to adopt metrics that reflect the full scope of nursing practice—including surveillance, symptom management and care coordination.
Her co-authors include Lori Kennedy, Ph.D., RN, ACNP-BC, from the Center for Nursing Science at UC Davis Health and the Betty Irene Moore School of Nursing at UC Davis in Sacramento, California; and Laura Beth Kalvas, Ph.D., RN, from the Center for Nursing Excellence and the Center for Biobehavioral Health at the Abigail Wexner Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital in Columbus, Ohio.
"At a time when health care professional burnout and turnover are high, our solution is to concentrate on what makes nursing the most trusted health care profession," the authors write. "Data drive accountability. We ask our physician colleagues to join in our call for change in how nursing quality is measured in hospital environments. The value of nursing care is not in the sum of harms prevented. It is in the sum of what nurses do."
The commentary highlights that traditional metrics—such as hospital-acquired infections or pressure injuries—force a defensive economic case for nursing investments, overlooking the critical role nurses play in early intervention and preventing clinical deterioration.
Drawing on nine core practice domains established by the American Academy of Nursing's Expert Panel on Acute and Critical Care, the authors call for a shift toward nurse-sensitive patient outcomes and invite physician colleagues to partner in reforming health care quality evaluation.
Publication details
Lori S. Kennedy et al., Time to Measure the Outcomes of What Nurses Really Do, JAMA Internal Medicine (2026). DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2026.5066
Journal information: JAMA Internal Medicine
Key medical concepts
Clinical categories
Allied health Provided by University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing Who's behind this story?
Sadie Harley
BSc Life Sciences & Ecology. Microbiology lab background with pharmaceutical news experience in oil, gas, and renewable industries. Full profile →
Andrew Zinin
Master's in physics with research experience. Long-time science news enthusiast. Plays key role in Science X's editorial success. Full profile →
Citation: New commentary calls for shift to nurse-sensitive outcome measures (2026, October 20) retrieved 20 October 2026 from https://medicalxpress.com/news/2026-10-commentary-shift-nurse-sensitive-outcome.html This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.