Australians support voluntary assisted dying, but with clear limits
· Medical Xpressedited by Lisa Lock, reviewed by Andrew Zinin
Lisa Lock
Scientific Editor
Meet our editorial team
Behind our editorial process
Andrew Zinin
Chief Editor
Meet our editorial team
Behind our editorial process Editors' notes
This article has been reviewed according to Science X's editorial process and policies. Editors have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility:
fact-checked
trusted source
proofread
The GIST Add as preferred source
New research from Edith Cowan University (ECU) has found that Australians broadly support voluntary assisted dying (VAD) as an end-of-life choice, but most believe access should remain limited to people experiencing terminal illness or a significantly reduced quality of life.
The research surveyed 704 Australian adults and is believed to be the first large-scale study investigating public attitudes toward VAD. Researchers investigated what people think about VAD regardless of age or health status—that is, beyond the endorsed eligibility criteria—and whether views differ depending on factors such as background, personal experiences and life stage.
Associate Professor Eyal Gringart said the research began in 2021 as interest in VAD grew and legislation was introduced across Australia.
"The project was inspired by conversations about end-of-life choices occurring across the country at a time when VAD legislation was progressing through different states and territories," Gringart said. "Our earlier qualitative research explored older adults' views of VAD. This study built on that work by developing a survey that examined attitudes across the broader Australian community."
The study, now published in OMEGA—Journal of Death and Dying, found that many Australians viewed VAD as a fundamental human right and wanted the option to be available should their quality of life deteriorate significantly. However, support was conditional. Participants generally supported current eligibility criteria and opposed extending access to people on the grounds of mental illness or to those who wished to end their lives regardless of their health status.
The research also found that Australians would like more conversations about end-of-life choices and place a high value on dignity and personal choice when considering care at the end of life.
"People told us they want more discussion about end-of-life options," Gringart said. "Many saw VAD as a form of reassurance, knowing the option would be available if they were facing an incurable illness or severe decline in their quality of life. At the same time, they were thoughtful and cautious about who should be eligible."
The study identified religious affiliation as the strongest factor associated with lower levels of support for VAD, while women and people with previous experience of euthanasia or VAD were generally more supportive.
One finding that surprised the researchers was that respondents with higher levels of education were somewhat less permissive toward VAD than previous studies had suggested.
More information
Eyal Gringart et al, Community Attitudes Towards Voluntary Assisted Dying: Beyond Endorsed Eligibilities, OMEGA—Journal of Death and Dying (2026). DOI: 10.1177/00302228261475233
Key medical concepts
Terminal DiseaseMental DisordersEuthanasia
Clinical categories
Geriatric palliative careHealthy aging Provided by Edith Cowan University Who's behind this story?
Lisa Lock
BA art history, MA material culture. Former museum editor, paramedic, and transplant coordinator. Editing for Science X since 2021. Full profile →
Andrew Zinin
Master's in physics with research experience. Long-time science news enthusiast. Plays key role in Science X's editorial success. Full profile →
Citation: Australians support voluntary assisted dying, but with clear limits (2026, September 16) retrieved 16 September 2026 from https://medicalxpress.com/news/2026-09-australians-voluntary-dying-limits.html This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.