H. pylori screening could return fivefold value in gastric cancer prevention
· Medical Xpressedited by Gaby Clark, reviewed by Andrew Zinin
Gaby Clark
Scientific Editor
Meet our editorial team
Behind our editorial process
Andrew Zinin
Chief Editor
Meet our editorial team
Behind our editorial process Editors' notes
This article has been reviewed according to Science X's editorial process and policies. Editors have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility:
fact-checked
peer-reviewed publication
trusted source
proofread
The GIST Add as preferred source
Each unit of cost invested in Helicobacter pylori screening can generate approximately a fivefold return in gastric cancer prevention benefits.
The gastric cancer prevention research team at National Taiwan University Hospital and College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, has pioneered a globally applicable preventive model for gastric cancer control. To inform public health policymaking, the research team developed a globally adaptable decision-tree model to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of H. pylori screening. The findings were published in JAMA on June 1, 2026.
Building on Taiwan's nationwide fecal immunochemical test-based colorectal cancer screening program, the gastric cancer prevention team has conducted a 10-year randomized clinical trial demonstrating that the additional use of an H. pylori stool antigen test (HPSA) alongside fecal occult blood testing could simultaneously achieve the dual goals of colorectal cancer and gastric cancer prevention. The findings were previously published on Sept. 30, 2024, in JAMA.
"To translate the findings of this pragmatic randomized clinical trial into public health policy, cost considerations are essential," said first author Dr. Yi-Chia Lee, professor of internal medicine in the Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology at National Taiwan University.
In this study, the research team developed a Markov decision-analytic model to estimate the 30-year cost-effectiveness of implementing this integrated strategy. The results demonstrated that H. pylori screening is a cost-saving strategy, with every unit of cost invested generating approximately a fivefold return in gastric cancer prevention benefits.
The team further collaborated with European and U.S. researchers to evaluate the strategy under higher health care cost settings. Even in these scenarios, H. pylori screening remained cost-effective. Although initial investments are required for screening and eradication therapy, the strategy is expected to reduce future expenditures related to gastric cancer surgery, chemotherapy and targeted therapies, while also minimizing quality-of-life losses caused by the disease.
In an accompanying editorial, John M. Inadomi, deputy editor of JAMA, wrote, "Countries with gastric cancer incidence greater than or equal to that of Taiwan could expect similar economic value from HPSA screening, assuming costs, antibiotic resistance, and reinfection rates are also similar."
Publication details
Yi-Chia Lee et al, Cost-Effectiveness of Fecal Immunochemical Testing Alone vs Co-Testing With Helicobacter pylori Stool Antigen, JAMA (2026). DOI: 10.1001/jama.2026.6908
Journal information: Journal of the American Medical Association
Clinical categories
GastroenterologyCommon illnesses & PreventionPreventive medicineOncology Provided by National Taiwan University Who's behind this story?
Gaby Clark
MA in English, copy editor since 2021 with experience in higher education and health content. Dedicated to trustworthy science news. Full profile →
Andrew Zinin
Master's in physics with research experience. Long-time science news enthusiast. Plays key role in Science X's editorial success. Full profile →
Citation: H. pylori screening could return fivefold value in gastric cancer prevention (2026, June 26) retrieved 27 June 2026 from https://medicalxpress.com/news/2026-06-pylori-screening-fivefold-gastric-cancer.html This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.