Data reveal half of England's health boards deliberately delay patient care with 'minimum waits'
· Medical Xpressedited by Sadie Harley, reviewed by Andrew Zinin
Sadie Harley
Scientific Editor
Meet our editorial team
Behind our editorial process
Andrew Zinin
Chief Editor
Meet our editorial team
Behind our editorial process Editors' notes
This article has been reviewed according to Science X's editorial process and policies. Editors have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility:
fact-checked
peer-reviewed publication
trusted source
proofread
The GIST Add as preferred source
Nearly half of health boards in England are deliberately delaying care for patients by imposing minimum waiting times in an attempt to manage demand and control costs, exclusive data published by The BMJ reveal.
A total of 17 of the 36 Integrated Care Boards (ICBs)—responsible for planning health services for their local populations—have introduced minimum waits of between 12 and 16 weeks for procedures including hip, knee and cataract surgery.
The Royal College of Surgeons (RCS) said it was "concerned by the scale" of measures that can prolong patients' pain, while the Royal College of General Practitioners (RCGP) said the waits were "difficult to justify."
The BMJ sent Freedom of Information requests to all 36 ICBs in England. Some 35 boards responded (a 97% response rate).
Of these, 17 (49%) confirmed they had imposed some form of minimum wait. A further 17 ICBs said they did not have a minimum wait, while one—NHS North East London—was unable to say.
Of the ICBs with minimum waiting times in place, two—Shropshire, Telford and Wrekin and West Yorkshire—have introduced a minimum wait of 16 weeks for all routine procedures.
But experts warn that imposing blanket 16-week waits in particular risks breaching the NHS Constitution's 18-week referral-to-treatment standard—a target that has not been met nationally since February 2016.
The responses show that ICBs with policies in place include South East London, which has introduced a 16-week minimum wait for cataract treatment, and Humber and North Yorkshire, which has imposed a "planning assumption" of 16 weeks, under which NHS and independent providers expect patients to wait an average of 16 weeks.
North East and North Cumbria has imposed a similar "planning assumption" that patients will wait an average of 15 weeks for all elective procedures. Six other ICBs (Birmingham and Solihull, Black Country, Coventry and Warwickshire, Devon, Hereford and Worcestershire and Somerset) have a minimum wait of 14 weeks for all elective procedures.
Meanwhile, Leicester, Leicestershire and Rutland has a 14-week minimum wait for orthopedics and ophthalmology, Thames Valley has a 14-week minimum wait for cataracts, and Dorset has a 14-week minimum wait for independent surgical providers of NHS care.
Some ICBs told The BMJ the measures allowed them to make the best use of financial resources and ensure patients were treated fairly.
Reacting to the data, RCS England President Tim Lane said, "We recognize the significant financial and capacity pressures facing the NHS, but minimum waits risk meaning that patients who are clinically ready for treatment are deliberately made to wait."
He added, "For patients, this can mean living with pain, living with reduced mobility, experiencing anxiety for longer, as well as being unable to work or carry out normal activities. There is also a risk that a patient's condition may deteriorate while they are waiting, potentially changing their clinical needs and priority for treatment."
RCGP President Victoria Tzortziou Brown said blanket minimum waiting times "are difficult to justify, particularly where patients could otherwise be treated sooner."
She added, "At a time when the NHS is trying to bring waiting times down, we should be doing everything possible to ensure patients can get the care they need without unnecessary delays."
Sally Gainsbury, senior policy analyst at the Nuffield Trust think tank, told The BMJ: "Limiting activity by a certain minimum waiting time can be an equitable and rational response to making sure your budget is spread evenly across your population." But she added, "I'm concerned there isn't clarity on how to do this fairly."
Commenting on the use of minimum waits, an NHS spokesperson said, "While commissioned wait policies help the NHS make the best possible use of its services, staff and budgets—all patients are seen in order of clinical need."
They added, "We recognize that any wait for treatment can be difficult for patients, and we would not expect any organization to commission waits that risk breaching NHS Constitution standards, which set an 18-week maximum wait for elective treatment."
Publication details
NHS rationing revealed: Half of ICBs deliberately delaying patient care with 'minimum waits', The BMJ (2026). DOI: 10.1136/bmj-2026-100765
Journal information: British Medical Journal (BMJ)
Key medical concepts
Clinical categories
Hospital medicine Provided by British Medical Journal Who's behind this story?
Sadie Harley
BSc Life Sciences & Ecology. Microbiology lab background with pharmaceutical news experience in oil, gas, and renewable industries. Full profile →
Andrew Zinin
Master's in physics with research experience. Long-time science news enthusiast. Plays key role in Science X's editorial success. Full profile →
Citation: Data reveal half of England's health boards deliberately delay patient care with 'minimum waits' (2026, September 9) retrieved 10 September 2026 from https://medicalxpress.com/news/2026-09-reveal-england-health-boards-deliberately.html This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.