New guide could help scientists see deeper into the human body using light and sound
· Medical Xpressedited by Gaby Clark, reviewed by Robert Egan
Gaby Clark
Scientific Editor
Meet our editorial team
Behind our editorial process
Robert Egan
Senior Editor
Meet our editorial team
Behind our editorial process Editors' notes
This article has been reviewed according to Science X's editorial process and policies. Editors have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility:
fact-checked
trusted source
proofread
The GIST Add as preferred source
Scientists have published the most comprehensive analysis to date of ultrasound detectors underpinning photoacoustic tomography (PAT)—a fast-emerging medical imaging technology capable of revealing blood vessels, tumors and tissue function deep inside the body.
Published in Nature Reviews Methods Primers, researchers at the University of Birmingham and UCL reveal that large ceramic detectors are currently best for deep imaging, while optical ultrasound sensors may be the future for high-resolution imaging of tiny structures.
The authors reviewed published data on 82 ultrasound detectors used in photoacoustic imaging, establishing the first standardized "noise-equivalent pressure" (NEP) landscape—a performance map showing which detectors can hear the faintest biological signals across four main types:
- Ceramic piezoelectric detectors;
- Polymer piezoelectric detectors;
- CMUTs (capacitive ultrasound detectors); and
- Optical ultrasound sensors that detect sound using light rather than electricity.
PAT works by shining short pulses of laser light into tissue. When tissues absorb the light, they produce tiny ultrasound waves that researchers can detect—using them to create images of blood vessels, tumors and other structures inside the body. However, sound waves originating from deep tissues are extremely weak—the deeper the target, the weaker the signal.
The researchers found that:
- Large ceramic detectors are the most sensitive to low-frequency ultrasound waves that arrive head-on, making them well suited to deep-tissue imaging, such as breast cancer imaging;
- Optical sensors excel when detectors need to be tiny—these detectors can be made extremely small, often under 100 micrometers across, while remaining highly sensitive;
- Polymer detectors provide broader frequency coverage—this can help capture more image detail, particularly for superficial structures; and
- CMUT detectors showed sensitivity comparable to some of the best technologies, but published measurements lacked detail, making it difficult to assess true performance.
Lead author Dr. James Guggenheim, from the University of Birmingham, said, "There is no single 'best' ultrasound detector for all photoacoustic imaging applications. Deep tissue imaging, such as breast cancer detection, currently benefits from very sensitive ceramic detectors. However, optical ultrasound sensors, which are already best for high-resolution imaging of tiny blood vessels, might one day come to dominate even in deep tissue imaging as their sensitivity increases."
"Our study provides researchers and manufacturers with a practical guide to selecting the right detector technology for specific clinical challenges now. It also highlights where future innovation is needed, for example, to develop dense, small-element detector arrays capable of delivering both deep-tissue and high-resolution imaging."
Until now, comparing detector technologies has been difficult because researchers used inconsistent definitions and measurement approaches. The study concludes that future improvements in photoacoustic imaging will depend on creating more sensitive detectors. There also needs to be improvement in detector arrays, standardization of how performance is measured, and development of practical high-channel-count systems for clinical use.
More information
James A. Guggenheim et al, Noise-equivalent pressures of ultrasound detectors used in photoacoustic tomography, Nature Reviews Methods Primers (2026). DOI: 10.1038/s43586-026-00510-6
Clinical categories
Diagnostic radiology Provided by University of Birmingham Who's behind this story?
Gaby Clark
MA in English, copy editor since 2021 with experience in higher education and health content. Dedicated to trustworthy science news. Full profile →
Robert Egan
Bachelor's in mathematical biology, Master's in creative writing. Well-traveled with unique perspectives on science and language. Full profile →
Citation: New guide could help scientists see deeper into the human body using light and sound (2026, August 20) retrieved 20 August 2026 from https://medicalxpress.com/news/2026-08-scientists-deeper-human-body.html This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.