Betelgeuse is the the 10th-brightest star in the night sky
(Image: ESO)

One of the brightest stars in the night sky may not be on verge of exploding after all

by · Manchester Evening News

Some astronomers believe the 10th-brightest star in the night sky, Betelgeuse, is on the brink of exploding as a supernova because of the way it brightens and dims. Now a new theory has emerged that the observed pulsing of Betelgeuse is probably caused by an unseen companion star orbiting it.

Formally named Alpha Ori B but dubbed “Betelbuddy” by astrophysicist Jared Goldberg, the smaller star acts like a snowplough as it orbits Betelgeuse, pushing light-blocking dust out of the way and temporarily making Betelgeuse seem brighter. Goldberg, whose team has had a paper accepted for publication in The Astrophysical Journal, said: "We ruled out every intrinsic source of variability that we could think of as to why the brightening and dimming was happening in this way,” says Goldberg, the study’s lead author and a Flatiron research fellow at the Flatiron Institute’s Center for Computational Astrophysics. “The only hypothesis that seemed to fit is that Betelgeuse has a companion.”

Goldberg co-authored the study with Meridith Joyce of the University of Wyoming and László Molnár of Konkoly Observatory at the HUN-REN Research Centre for Astronomy and Earth Sciences in Hungary.

READ MORE: Nasa captures incredible image of star '5000 times brighter than the Sun'

Betelgeuse is a red giant star around 100,000 times the brightness of our sun and more than 400 million times the volume. The star is nearing the end of its life span, and when it dies, the resulting explosion will be bright enough to see during the day for weeks.

Astronomers can predict when Betelgeuse will die by effectively ‘checking its pulse.’ It’s a variable star, meaning it gets brighter and dimmer, pulsing like a heartbeat. In Betelgeuse’s case, there are two heartbeats: one that pulses on a timescale a little longer than a year, and one that pulses on a timescale of about six years.

One of these heartbeats is Betelgeuse’s fundamental mode, a pattern of brightening and dimming that’s intrinsic to the star itself. If the star’s fundamental mode is its long-scale heartbeat, then Betelgeuse could be ready to blow sooner than expected. However, if its fundamental mode is its short-scale heartbeat, as several studies suggest, then its longer heartbeat is a phenomenon called a long secondary period. In that case, this longer brightening and dimming would be caused by something external to the star.

Scientists still don’t know for sure what causes long secondary periods, but one leading theory is that they arise when a star has a companion that circles it and barrels through the cosmic dust that is produced and expelled by the star. The displaced dust alters how much starlight reaches Earth, changing the star’s apparent brightness.

The researchers explored whether other processes may have caused the long secondary period, such as the churning of the star’s interior or periodic changes in the star’s powerful magnetic field. After combining data from direct observations of Betelgeuse with advanced computer models that simulate the star’s activity, the team concluded that the Betelbuddy is by far the most likely explanation.

“Nothing else added up,” Goldberg says. “Basically, if there’s no Betelbuddy, then that means there’s something way weirder going on — something impossible to explain with current physics.”

The team has yet to determine exactly what the Betelbuddy is, but they assume it’s a star of up to twice the sun’s mass.

“It is difficult to say what the companion actually is beyond providing mass and orbital constraints,” says Joyce. “A sunlike star is the most probable type of companion, but that is by no means conclusive.”

“A more exotic hypothesis I personally like, though the opinions of my co-authors may differ, is that the companion is a neutron star — the core of a star that has already gone supernova,” she says. “However, in that case, we would expect to see evidence of this with X-ray observations, and we haven’t. I think we should look again.”