Condemnation from leading news outlets was nearly universal, after reporters from CNN, MS NOW and Politico were denied access to the White House on Sept 19.
PHOTO: AFP

US news outlets express solidarity after Trump bars some reporters from White House

· The Straits Times
  • President Trump banned CNN, MS NOW, and Politico from the White House, accusing them of publishing false, negative stories without providing evidence.
  • Major media outlets and Democrats condemned the ban as unconstitutional and an attack on free press and democracy.
  • Some Republicans supported the ban, citing "fake news," but others and conservative commentators warned it sets a dangerous precedent against press freedom.

WASHINGTON – Many major media outlets and some high-profile Democrats panned US President Donald Trump’s abrupt decision to ban CNN, MS NOW and Politico from the White House.

The latest barrage of threats against the press came on the morning of Sept 19, when reporters for the outlets were denied access to the White House and had their badges confiscated.

On the evening of Sept 18, he had accused the three outlets of running “purposely negative stories” that were untrue, but did not give details. The Trump administration has not said what led to the decision, which many First Amendment groups called unconstitutional and unlikely to survive a court challenge.

Condemnation from leading news outlets was nearly universal, including from many that compete directly with CNN, MS NOW and Politico.

“No news organisation – or person – should be retaliated against by the government over the words they use,” said Lauren Easton, a spokesperson for The Associated Press, which filed suit over restrictions that Trump tried to impose on its White House access in 2025.

The New York Times, The Washington Post and press associations released statements calling the ban an attack on free speech and the free press.

Journalists at Fox News have also taken issue with the ban. One Fox contributor, Ari Fleischer, said conservatives should challenge liberal reporters. “Argue and defeat them,” he said. “Don’t ban them. Or one day they’ll ban us.”

Another contributor, Jonathan Turley, said that “barring disfavoured media from the White House is a terrible precedent and practice”.

Jacqui Heinrich, a Fox News anchor and president of the White House Correspondents’ Association, said on social media that the right to First Amendment protections “does not depend on whether the president likes a news organisation’s coverage”.

“This is about more than the rights of journalists,” Heinrich added. “It is about the right of the American people to receive a full and independent account of the activities, policies and decisions of whoever occupies the nation’s highest office.”

Democrats pounced on Trump’s ban as an attempt to hide his administration’s shortcomings and to distract voters from other issues. They pointed out that Republicans were heading into a challenging election cycle with high inflation and an unpopular war with Iran started by Trump, whose support in the polls has sagged.

“Trump just did what dictators throughout history have done,” Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer of New York said on social media. “This is a democracy. You will not be able to manipulate the news or hide the truth.”

Congressman Jamie Raskin of Maryland, the top Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee, called on the news media to boycott the White House if Trump “keeps violating press freedom”. Senator Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts said Trump was censoring the press and trying to “hide his failures”. Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont said that Trump wanted to “control the flow of information and silence media that might hold them accountable”.

Sanders said on social media: “We will not allow Trump to undermine the First Amendment, the Constitution and our democracy. We will not accept authoritarianism.”

High-ranking Republicans and members of the Trump administration mostly remained quiet on Saturday. But Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth, who has tried to restrict reporters’ access to the Pentagon, said he “fully supports” a ban on some outlets that he and Trump have labelled “fake news” for negative coverage.

“They endangered our troops with false stories, leaks, and trafficked in fiction and lies about the president,” Hegseth said, without providing examples or evidence.

Benny Johnson, a right-wing podcaster, celebrated the decision to block certain outlets from the White House and said Trump had been banned from social media platforms after the Jan 6 attack on the Capitol by his supporters.

“No one is infringing on their ability to do reporting,” Johnson said in a social media post.

The campaign of Mike Rogers, a Republican running with Trump’s backing for a Senate seat in Michigan, appeared to distance itself from the president’s decision.

Rogers “held a press conference just this morning with invites out to each of those outlets,” Alyssa Brouillet, a spokesperson for his campaign, said in a statement. “That tells you where he stands.”

Meghan McCain, a conservative commentator, was more explicit.

“Unpopular opinion in my parts, but it’s insane and a very slippery slope to kick media outlets you don’t like out of the White House,” McCain said. NYTIMES

  • Olivia Diaz and Taylor Robinson contributed reporting.
  • This article originally appeared in The New York Times.