Gillman Barracks, Sunset Way plans not fixed as government weighs competing needs: Alvin Tan
While the formal consultation period for environmental and heritage impact assessments ends on Aug 6, engagement with stakeholders will continue, says the minister of state for national development.
by Matthew Mohan · CNA · JoinRead a summary of this article on FAST.
Get bite-sized news via a new
cards interface. Give it a try.
Click here to return to FAST Tap here to return to FAST
FAST
SINGAPORE: Amid a public outcry over the proposed redevelopment of Gillman Barracks and Sunset Way, Minister of State for National Development Alvin Tan reiterated that plans are not finalised as he detailed the considerations and dilemmas in balancing needs "within our limited space".
Speaking in parliament on Tuesday (Aug 4), Mr Tan said the environmental and heritage studies being done for both sites were not meant to justify a detailed plan that was already fixed.
"They are an integral part of the consultation process through which the plan is shaped," he added.
The formal consultation period for the environmental impact assessments and heritage impact assessments ends on Thursday, but engagement with stakeholders will continue before the authorities decide how to carry out the development, Mr Tan said.
CNA Games
Guess Word
Crack the word, one row at a time
Buzzword
Create words using the given letters
Mini Sudoku
Tiny puzzle, mighty brain teaser
Mini Crossword
Small grid, big challenge
Word Search
Spot as many words as you can
Show More
Show Less
"This could involve adjustments to the development layout and the amount of greenery and heritage to conserve."
Mr Tan was responding to 18 questions from Members of Parliament (MPs) on planned housing developments in Gillman Barracks and Sunset Way. In a discussion that lasted close to 70 minutes, a total of 11 MPs and two Non-Constituency Members of Parliament (NCMPs) also rose to speak.
The government would always try to make the best use of existing land and safeguard important natural and heritage assets, but there would be times when difficult trade-offs could not be avoided, he added.
When that happens, agencies must be clear about why a site needs to be developed, deliberate over where to build and take care over how it is built, Mr Tan said.
This meant being honest with Singaporeans about the choices involved, listening to feedback and refining plans, before the government makes a final decision in the interest of Singapore and Singaporeans.
"The question before us is not whether housing, greenery or heritage matters. They all do. The challenge is how we balance these needs responsibly within our limited space," he said.
"We will and must always make the best use of existing land and safeguard our most important natural and heritage assets. But there will be times when we cannot avoid difficult trade-offs."
The Housing and Development Board (HDB) announced on Jul 10 that it would build new homes at Gillman Barracks and Sunset Way in Clementi following the completion of environmental and heritage studies.
About 15ha and at least 10ha of forest may be cleared at Maju Forest at Sunset Way and Gillman Barracks, respectively, to make room for these housing developments.
PROCEEDING WITH "GREAT CARE"
Mr Tan said the authorities do not start with sites that have "significant heritage or ecological value", but first look at whether they can make use of vacant land or better use of existing land.
"The next question then is how do we build responsibly when it is necessary to develop a site? We proceed with great care where a site has significant ecological or heritage value," he said.
This is when government agencies appoint independent external consultants to conduct an environmental impact assessment, heritage impact assessment, or both, Mr Tan added.
"Our general approach is to avoid impact where we can, where we can, reduce them where we cannot, and mitigate those that remain. We then publish the findings, the potential impact and proposed mitigation measures," said Mr Tan.
"This allows residents and the wider public to study the proposal and give their feedback and views."
Through these studies, the consultants establish what is on the site today, assess how the proposed development could affect these features, as well as recommend how to avoid, reduce or mitigate potential impact to the site.
For an environmental impact assessment, the consultants also propose a preliminary environmental management and monitoring plan, which sets out mitigation measures, monitoring arrangements and reporting requirements that will apply during development.
"Agencies then consider the studies and feedback before finalising the detailed plans," Mr Tan said, adding that these assessments "are not meant to justify a detailed plan that is already fixed".
Built in 1935, Gillman Barracks was a British military garrison before being repurposed into an arts precinct in 2012. It is now home to art galleries, bars, restaurants and lifestyle businesses.
The government announced in March 2024 that it was studying the possibility of introducing a new residential neighbourhood at Gillman Barracks.
To redevelop the Gillman Barracks site sensitively, HDB commissioned a study to understand the site’s ecology and heritage, and identify measures to mitigate the impact of development.
The studies covered an area of 47ha – comprising an approximately 40ha development area bounded by Depot Road, Alexandra Road, Telok Blangah Road/West Coast Highway and Telok Blangah Street 31, as well as a 7ha green area north of Telok Blangah Heights.
WHAT TO RETAIN AND CONSERVE?
In a supplementary question, MP Christopher de Souza (PAP-Holland-Bukit Timah) asked if the authorities could look at alternative sites close to Maju Forest, including a large worksite for the Cross Island Line at Clementi Avenue 5.
"Taking a leaf out of Dover Forest, and the debate I had some years ago, we managed to find alternative housing sites that preserved half of Dover Forest and it was a win-win situation. So I invite the good minister to look at this as a blank sheet of paper to see whether we can achieve such a win-win," he said.
Mr Tan said the site would be considered for residential development after the MRT line is complete.
"We do our best to optimise the land use and to tap the vacant land and brownfield sites where possible, but there are no other suitable sites to meet the near-term demand in the vicinity," he said.
MP Kenneth Tiong (WP-Aljunied) pointed out that the Ministry of Sustainability and the Environment (MSE) has designated 2026 as the year of climate adaptation, signalling it as a national priority, and asked why the ministry has "not been seen leading and advocating" for Maju Forest.
Mr Tan said he disagreed with the characterisation. "The government makes decisions across different ministries – we speak to MSE, MSE gives us the feedback. But at the end of the day, we have to make decisions based on the best interest of Singapore and Singaporeans."
Minister for Sustainability and the Environment Grace Fu said that suggesting her ministry take a different position from the Ministry of National Development is "not how we work as a government".
“For any one of us standing in front of here presenting a position to government, the rest of us are in support. So I think if a WP member is hoping for a fight between ministers, I think they will be disappointed,” she said.
Workers' Party NCMP Andre Low also asked if not going ahead with the development plans remains an option for the authorities.
"I made it quite clear that the sites we that mentioned earlier on, Sunset Way as well as Gillman Barracks, have already been zoned for residential use under our master plan," said Mr Tan. "And they have been set aside for housing, so we will proceed."
At the same time, how the authorities build is important, he added, which is why studies have been carried out, with mitigation "as best as possible" of the ecological and heritage impact to the sites.
When it comes to Gillman Barracks, the authorities are studying how to retain most of the native-dominated secondary forest within the site and looking at how to maintain ecological connections in the east-west and north-south directions, said Mr Tan.
The east-west connection would link Telok Blangah Hill Park and HortPark, while the north-south connection would comprise an ecological corridor, supporting the movement of birds towards Berlayar Creek and Labrador Nature Reserve.
Given the "distinctive heritage character" of Gillman Barracks, authorities are also studying the retention of all buildings assessed to be of exceptional heritage significance, as well as most of those assessed to be of high heritage significance.
"This would allow the future neighbourhood to build on the character and charm of the former colonial buildings. But where a heritage building cannot be retained because of practical site constraints, we will explore other ways to preserve its history," said Mr Tan.
At Sunset Way, the retention of a "significant stretch of greenery" along the former Jurong Railway Line, along with the retention of a natural stream and its surrounding riparian buffer are being examined, he added.
Mr Tan stressed that the government values heritage and green spaces, but also want Singaporeans and future generations to have access to affordable public housing.
"I wish we had an abundance of land, so we can provide all of these without having to make trade-offs. But that is not our reality," he said.
"Our choices are narrower than those faced by larger countries. We thus have to make the best of our limited land."
Sign up for our newsletters
Get our pick of top stories and thought-provoking articles in your inbox
Get the CNA app
Stay updated with notifications for breaking news and our best stories
Get WhatsApp alerts
Join our channel for the top reads for the day on your preferred chat app