With Nato’s car-crash Ankara summit looming, the West needs a new survival strategy
· EUobserverOther Nato countries may dislike it. But at least they will have something to discuss in Ankara. (Source: Nato)
With Nato’s car-crash Ankara summit looming, the West needs a new survival strategy
Unlock article and share
By Edward Lucas,
London
,
Nato’s survival, not just its summit in the Turkish capital on 7-8 July, is at stake.
Donald Tusk, the Polish prime minister, now speaks bluntly of the alliance’s “ongoing disintegration”.
Capriciousness in the White House over troop deployments and readiness to fight exposes Europe’s strategic nakedness.
Does anyone really believe now that Trump would go to war with Russia over for Europe’s security?
But Viktor Orbán’s departure casts another bleak light on Europe’s dithering. With Hungary’s veto gone, it is clearer that domestic political weaknesses in the big national governments (Britain, France, Germany) create corrosive caution and timidity.
Nor are the institutions in better shape. Their decision-making was already too slow in peacetime. In current conditions it is suicidally sleepy.
Meanwhile, the Kremlin clocks tick ever-faster.
In its latest annual report, Dutch military intelligence reckons Russia could be ready for war with Nato (make that: “the remains of Nato”) within a year of a halt to fighting in Ukraine.
Sub-threshold confrontation?
A sub-threshold confrontation, aimed at busting Europe’s remaining unity and credibility, could come even sooner.
Recent days may feel like scenes in a disaster movie. But in the two months before Ankara we still have a chance to re-write the script.
True, nothing now will be easy, cheap or safe. But we do have options.
Given that no country can defend itself alone, the priority is to make new alliances: flexible, capable frameworks of threat-aware allies that are willing to take risks and make sacrifices for themselves and for others.
The most promising group of like-minded states includes the Nordic five (Denmark, Iceland, Finland, Norway and Sweden) and the Baltic three (Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania). Together with Britain and the Netherlands, which are part of the Joint Expeditionary Force (JEF).
The JEF is a largely notional military outfit, albeit with excellent PR.
To read this story, log in or subscribe
Enjoy access to all articles and 25 years of archives, comment and gift articles. Become a member for as low as €1,75 per week.
Become a member
Already a member? Login
Unlock article and share
Latest from Baltics
71 years without a military strategy, Germany just wrote one
Western doom-mongers are doing Putin’s work for him
Latest from EU and the World
Europe’s brutal awakening – the costs of its inaction in the Middle East
20 Russia-sanctions packages later, Europe’s problem is timing – not strength
Latest from Nato
[Interview] Estonia’s spy chief: Russia cannot replenish fallen soldiers – they have a serious battlefield problem
EU officials sidestep ‘Pentagon memo’ on booting Spain from Nato
Latest from Russia
London offered Russian oligarchs what others could not. Today their luxury villas are falling into disrepair
EU and Canada deepen ties at Armenia summit in face of Putin and Trump threats
Latest from UK
Last year the far-right looked strong in Europe. Now, the cracks are starting to show
To be or not to be (involved) — that is the question
Latest from Opinion
‘Nothing changes’ — but what’s the point of a trade deal with Trump?
US troop cuts in Europe risk inspiring Russian aggression
Other Nato countries may dislike it. But at least they will have something to discuss in Ankara. (Source: Nato)
Topics
Author Bio
Edward Lucas is a former senior editor at The Economist, founder and director of the Baltic International Security Centre think-tank, and a regular writer on defence, security and espionage for The Times and Foreign Policy. He is the author of The New Cold War (2008) and Deception (2011).