EU watchdog questions commission’s secretive ‘Reality Checks’ with corporate lobbyists

by · EUobserver

Reality checks fed into EU Commission proposals on AI training data – that closely mirror lobbying demands from Microsoft, Google and their trade associations, documents show

EU politics

Unlock article and share
By Wester van Gaal,
Amsterdam
,

The European Ombudsman is opening an inquiry into the EU Commission’s so-called “Reality Checks,” a new form of closed-door consultation, often reserved for businesses and lobbyists, that feeds directly into the EU’s simplification and deregulation drive.

Ombudswoman Teresa Anjinho announced on Wednesday (8 July) that she has asked the commission for a written reply and access to internal documentation, following a complaint lodged in April by the lobby watchdog Corporate Europe Observatory (CEO).

The issue at stake is the commission’s decision to exempt Reality Checks from standard transparency rules for meetings. 

Launched during the early days of Brussels’s deregulation push — the so-called omnibus process — Reality Checks are a new “consultation tool” aimed mainly at business “practitioners.”

Their goal, according to the commission’s own operational guidance, is to “ensure that policy objectives are achieved, and administrative burdens are minimised.”

That same document, obtained by CEO, says these meetings should be “exempt” from the same transparency rules as other meetings because they are technical in nature and not political.

They are, as the commission’s directorate explains it, organised “in response to a direct and specific request from the commission for factual information, data and expertise.”

But CEO’s Kenneth Haar, who filed the complaint, told EUobserver that the commission, through this route, can “plan far reaching deregulation with the very industries concerned, and no one will know about it until the proposal is published.” 

"The official explanation is that Reality Checks are to be technical exercises," Haar said. "In reality they are highly political, in that they help guide the commission on controversial issues."

Business interests

A CEO investigation published in April, based on participant lists obtained through access-to-documents requests, found that companies and business associations often made up between 80-100 percent of participants across commission directorates. 

The meetings they attended included sessions on sensitive topics such as free trade, steel, defence and artificial intelligence. 

To read this story, log in or subscribe

Enjoy access to all articles and 25 years of archives, comment and gift articles. Become a subscriber for as low as €1,75 per week.

Read without limits
Already a subscriber? Login
Unlock article and share

Latest from Digital

Commissioner denies ‘EU FBI’ as Europol gets power to prod states into criminal probes

EU praises open source for tech sovereignty — then backs W, a private for-profit microblogging platform

Latest from Economy

Ireland’s EU presidency already under pressure – how long can Europe resist sanctioning Russian alumina plant?

If EU leaders let banks write the rules, the digital euro will fail as public money

Latest from EU Politics

Listen: Does Alexis Tsipras stand a chance of becoming Greece’s prime minister again?

Europe’s grand coalition is over: It’s time for mainstream parties to break with the European People’s Party

Latest from Lobbying

EU ethics panel approved job for ex-commissioner at NGO implicated in Qatargate

The EU’s new AI envoy is a tech CEO with extraordinary conflicts of interest

Latest from EU politics

How did nine S&D MEPs, two Greens and half Renew Europe end up voting for the EU’s new far-right inspired deportation law?

Brussels just dodged a Brexit‑fuelled airport meltdown with its biometrics U‑turn

Reality checks fed into EU Commission proposals on AI training data - that closely mirror lobbying demands from Microsoft, Google and their trade associations, documents show

Topics

Author Bio

Wester van Gaal is our economics editor. He joined EUobserver in September 2021. Previously, he was editor-in-chief of Motherboard, Vice Media’s technology and science website, and worked as a climate economy journalist for The Correspondent. He is based in Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

+ Follow author by email