The police removing the Mahila Morcha activists during a protest march taken out to Kannur Town Police Station on Thursday demanding the arrest of former district panchayat president P.P. Divya in connection with a case related to the death of former Kannur ADM Naveen Babu. | Photo Credit: S.K. MOHAN

ADM’s death: court adjourns verdict on Divya’s anticipatory bail plea till Oct. 29

The court, presided over by Judge K.T. Nisar Ahammed, heard arguments from both the defence and prosecution regarding the case linked to the suicide of ADM Naveen Babu

by · The Hindu

The Thalassery Principal Sessions Court on Thursday adjourned the verdict on the anticipatory bail plea of Communist Party of India (Marxist) leader and former Kannur district panchayat president P.P. Divya until October 29.

The court, presided over by Judge K.T. Nisar Ahammed, heard arguments from both the defence and prosecution regarding the case linked to the suicide of ADM Naveen Babu.

Ms. Divya told the court that her remarks against Naveen were based on complaints of corruption she had received regarding him.

Her lawyer also told the court that the Kannur District Collector had informed her about the farewell ceremony for Naveen and asked whether she would be there, to which she had replied in the affirmative.

Ms. Divya’s lawyer emphasised that her intentions were not to insult Naveen but to address issues of corruption. He highlighted her dedication as a social activist, noting her extensive travel and active involvement in politics. The defence also presented Ms. Divya as a responsible public servant, pointing out her quick resignation following the allegations against her.

He made a submission in the court that his client would appear before the police if she was summoned by the investigating officer.

During the court session, Ms. Divya’s lawyer articulated that many allegations against her were fabricated and that her role as district panchayat president had been characterised by anti-corruption advocacy. He mentioned that complaints from the public about corruption were frequently directed at officials, emphasising that it was the duty of public servants to respond to such issues.

The defence highlighted that the suicide occurred long after Ms. Divya’s speech at a farewell meeting for Naveen Babu, contending that the claim of abetment to suicide was unfounded.  The lawyer stressed that there was no evidence suggesting her speech led to the tragic outcome, and that Ms. Divya had been victimised by media scrutiny.

The lawyer for Naveen’s family said he as well as the prosecution opposed the bail plea of Ms. Divya, who was removed from the post of district panchayat president by the CPI(M) after she was booked for abetting the ADM’s suicide.

He also told reporters that the prosecution told the court there were no corruption complaints against Naveen. The lawyer also said the prosecution submitted the Kannur District Collector’s statement as per which Ms. Divya was never invited to the farewell ceremony and that he had requested her not to make any corruption allegations at the event.

The prosecution argued for Ms. Divya’s custody, asserting that her participation in the media coverage of her speech was deliberate and intended to insult Naveen. Her remarks during the farewell meeting were threatening, contributing to the environment surrounding Naveen’s death.

The prosecution argued that the petrol pump issue was under the Central government’s domain. The district panchayat president cannot interfere in the matter. Ms. Divya cannot directly call the ADM, the person holding the rank of Executive Magistrate, and ask him to issue NOC. This was a form of corruption.

The prosecution claimed that her speech at the farewell meeting was delivered in a threatening manner and that the media presence was orchestrated to record her comments. The prosecution stated that the context of her speech contributed to Naveen’s suicide, labelling her remarks as aggressive..

The prosecution also indicated that Ms. Divya’s actions might send a negative message to society regarding public officials. The prosecution urged the court to consider the significance of Naveen’s role as a second-ranking officer in the district administration, contending that the case warranted a thorough investigation and her custody for further questioning.

(with inputs from PTI)

Published - October 24, 2024 09:00 pm IST