25 US states sue to block Trump tariffs

Twenty-five US states, nearly all led by Democrats, sued US President Donald Trump's administration yesterday over wide-ranging tariffs, arguing that the president had exceeded his authority in imposing the new levies on dozens of countries.

The states filed suit at the US Court of International Trade in New York, asking that judges halt the implementation of the tariffs, declare them unlawful and order the US government to issue refunds.

The legal challenge relates to Mr Trump's latest tariffs of 10% to 12.5% imposed against 60 trading partners, which formed the bulk of US imports last month.

The tariffs were imposed after probes by the US Trade Representative's (USTR) office over allegations of "forced labour," conducted under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974.

"There is no rational fit between the purported problem of forced labour in international supply chains and the blanket global tariffs the USTR imposed," the coalition of states argued in a court filing.

Since taking office for his second term, Mr Trump has disrupted global trade by imposing wide-ranging tariffs against Washington's trading partners across the globe.

Mr Trump has argued that the US has been taken advantage of by international trading partners and has sought to use tariffs as leverage to strike new trade deals.

Yesterday, the White House hit back at the latest challenge to Mr Trump's tariffs, arguing that the government's move was legal.

"The United States is using its lawful authority to obtain the elimination of unreasonable acts, policies, and practices that burden US commerce," said White House spokesperson Kush Desai in a statement.

"Section 301 tariffs have proven to be a legally durable tool since the President's first term, and they remain so now," Mr Desai added.

Earlier challenges

Mr Trump's first round of tariffs, imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, was struck down by the US Supreme Court in February. He replaced those with a 10% global levy, which expired in July.

The new Section 301 tariffs replaced that levy, taking effect as the 10% tariff expired on July 24.

Of the 25 states in the suit, 23 have Democratic governors while two, Nevada and Vermont, are led by Republicans.

In their court filing, the states argued that the Section 301 probes were "a pretextual and unlawful effort to exert unfettered tariff power".

The document lays out a timeline of Mr Trump administration officials' statements, arguing that the investigations were rushed and prejudged when they were initiated.

"The Tariff Action is arbitrary, capricious, and contrary to law," the complaint says.

"The Plaintiff States oppose forced labour in all its forms and support protections for workers around the globe. But the administration cannot use forced labour as a pretext to continue its illegal tariff scheme."

Mr Trump's separate sector-specific tariffs, imposed under different legal authorities on steel, automobiles and other goods, have been unaffected by recent legal challenges.