EU demands Hungary explain Russia info leak claims

The European Union today demanded Hungary "explain itself as a matter of urgency", after fresh media reports that Budapest passed on EU information to Russia.

A consortium of Eastern European media outlets, The Insider, VSquare and Delfi, claimed last month that Hungarian Foreign Minister Peter Szijjarto had provided Moscow with "direct-line" access to "strategic information on crucial issues".

In a second part of their investigation published Wednesday, they claimed Mr Szijjarto offered to "immediately" send an EU document to Russia through the Hungarian embassy in Moscow about Ukraine's accession talks into the bloc.

The claims have sparked outrage in Europe, ahead of elections on Sunday in Hungary, where nationalist Prime Minister Viktor Orban is seeking a fifth term.

The EU said the reports based on leaked calls between the Hungarian and Russian foreign ministers raised the "alarming possibility" of a member state "actively working against the security and the interests of the EU and all its citizens."

"This is therefore extremely concerning, and it is for the member state government in question to explain itself as a matter of urgency," European Commission spokeswoman Paula Pinho told a press conference.

French Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot earlier on today accused Hungary of "betrayal" when asked about the telephone conversations.

"This is a betrayal of the solidarity required between the countries of the European Union," Mr Barrot told broadcaster France Inter.

Three ways Viktor Orban gives himself an edge in Hungary's vote

Observers and NGOs have raised concerns about Sunday's Hungarian presidential election taking place on an "uneven playing field" as nationalist Prime Minister Viktor Orban faces popular challenger Peter Magyar.

During Mr Orban's 16-year tenure, his ruling coalition has used its supermajority to overhaul the electoral system and leverage state resources to campaign, while his business allies radically changed the media environment.

The Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) has given increasingly critical reports on elections after noting in 2014 that Mr Orban's ruling party enjoyed an "undue advantage".

For the second time in a row, the OSCE has deployed a full observation mission for the elections, which marks only the third time ever of such a mission in an EU member state.

Mr Orban has touted the country's "very strong" democracy, saying his government "very strongly believes in... competition in politics".

Advantage at polls

Analysts say Mr Orban could still retain his majority, even if his Fidesz-KNDP alliance loses the popular vote by three or four percent due to the 2011 overhaul of the electoral system and subsequent redrawing of the constituency map.

Preferential mandates for ethnic minorities, which require substantially fewer votes for a parliamentary seat, could also benefit his alliance, as representatives of both the German and the Roma minorities usually speak out in support of the ruling coalition.

Hungarians in neighbouring countries, many grateful to Mr Orban for offering simplified naturalisation under a 2010 law, are allowed to vote by mail, unlike emigrants, who are generally critical of the nationalist leader.

Rights groups warned that outdated voter rolls and lax ballot security risk enabling mail-in ballots cast for deceased individuals.

Manipulation concerns are amplified by the fact that in Romania and Serbia Mr Orban-allied parties collect the votes of Hungarians there.

Media control

Since Mr Orban's return to power in 2010, many independent media outlets have shut down, while others have been bought by his business allies and turned into pro-Fidesz organs.

Media watchdog Reporters Without Borders (RSF) estimates that 80 percent of Hungary's press is controlled by "oligarchs" tied to the governing coalition and receive almost all state advertising money.

Critics accuse these outlets of unquestioningly echoing the government's narrative, along with the state media.

An 11-month study conducted last year by the Republikon Institute showed the public television's main news broadcast depicted Mr Orban positively 95 percent of the time, while his challenger, Mr Magyar, was portrayed in a negative context 96 percent of the time.

Mr Orban's government has repeatedly said that it doesn't interfere in the media.

Campaigning on taxpayers' money

Mr Orban is also accused of leveraging state resources to help his re-election bid, while the government has said it has a duty to "inform" people, even during campaigns.

In the lead-up to the vote, Mr Orban's party used multiple state mailing lists, including that of the tax authority, to spread his campaign messages.

The government has also conducted an extensive, taxpayer-financed media blitz advertising its anti-Ukraine positions, such as opposition to the country joining the European Union, with the latest billboards featuring the nationalist premier's face, urging Hungarians to "stand together".

Some state-owned companies, including electricity distributor MVM, have also paid for outdoor advertisement reinforcing Mr Orban's key messages on energy.

The government also allocated millions of euros to dozens of local NGOs linked to the ruling party, some of them sharing office space with Fidesz, a 2024 investigation by conservative site Valasz Online found.

Media have reported that several of these associations have been distributing pamphlets in support of ruling party candidates during this campaign.