USL Super League Players Have Unionized – Is NWSL Merger Ahead?
by Chris Deubert · ForbesLast week, a reported 97% of players in the USL Super League voted to unionize and be represented by the USL Players Association (USLPA). The unionization comes in the middle of the league’s first season and about two months after the National Women’s Soccer League (NWSL) and NWSL Players Association (NWSLPA) reached a groundbreaking collective bargaining agreement that seemed to give the NWSL a competitive advantage over the Super League. Super League players can be expected to push for a similar agreement, which might eventually help push the leagues to combine.
The NWSL and the Super League
The NWSL has been in existence since 2012 and has experienced considerable growth in recent years across various metrics. The league has expanded to 14 teams, with more expansion on the way. Nevertheless, the United Soccer League (USL) which operates two levels of men’s professional soccer beneath – but unaffiliated with – Major League Soccer (MLS), thought that the market for professional women’s soccer in the United States was still underserved.
Consequently, in 2021, the USL announced the formation of the Super League, which began play this past August with eight clubs. Prior to the league starting play, U.S. Soccer awarded the Super League Division 1 status, the highest level of sanctioning by the sports’ governing body. That status was based on the size of the league’s markets and stadiums.
The NWSL is also a Division 1 league, inviting comparisons between the leagues. The leagues already play in some of the same markets (New York City area, Washington, D.C., North Carolina, Kentucky), a fact which will become more complicated as the leagues expand. The leagues’ seasons overlap as well, with the NWSL playing from March through November and the Super League playing from August through May.
History is unkind to the leagues’ prospects as independent businesses. In every prior situation where a new sports league challenged an established rival, the leagues eventually either merged or the challenger folded. Such events date back to at least the 1903 merger between the National League (founded in 1876) and the American League (1901) to form today’s Major League Baseball. The NFL, NBA, and NHL too have all seen off rivals by incorporating some of their teams.
MORE FOR YOU
Today’s NYT Mini Crossword Hints And Answers For Thursday, November 14
Gaetz Resigns From House Before Ethics Report Can Be Released
NYT ‘Strands’ Today: Hints, Spangram And Answers For Thursday, November 14th
The NWSL’s response to the Super League’s launch, however, is a historical aberration. Many of the prior competitions between leagues resulted in antitrust litigation. In contrast, the NWSL congratulated the USL and surmised that the Super League would contribute to the continued growth of women’s soccer.
The NWSLPA’s Early Mover Advantage
NWSL players formed their union in 2017 and were formally recognized by the NWSL in 2018. In 2022, the league and the union agreed to their first ever collective bargaining agreement, principally concerned with nuts-and-bolts employer-employee issues, such as setting a minimum salary ($35,000), and establishing a 401(k), health insurance, and other benefits, including paid pregnancy and mental health leave.
But then, in August of this year, without any forewarning, the league and union agreed to a new collective bargaining agreement unprecedented in American sports. Specifically, the agreement eliminated the player draft, provided all players with unrestricted free agency at the expiration of their contracts, and provided players with a veto over trades. The agreement also provided the players with an explicit share of league broadcast revenues, a risky model first negotiated for by MLS players.
The parties explained the agreement as one which aligned with global standards. Left unsaid was how the player-friendly agreement might provide the league with an advantage over the Super League.
Super League Negotiations
The USL has voluntarily recognized the USLPA as the union representing Super League players. Consequently, pursuant to the National Labor Relations Act, the league is now bound to negotiate with the union in good faith over the players’ wages, hours, and other terms and conditions of employment.
The USLPA has recent useful experience. The USLPA and USL negotiated the first ever collective bargaining agreements for the USL Championship (a Division 2 league) and League One (a Division 3 league) in 2021 and 2022 respectively. Those agreements provided some stability and also basic levels of income and benefits to the players. A first-ever USLPA-Super League agreement will likely provide the same types of core employment protections and benefits.
What will be more interesting is the degree to which the union and league might copy the provisions of the NWSL-NWSLPA agreement, including specifically those providing players with a widely open labor market. It seems the Super League will have no choice – seeking to implement rules which significantly restrain player pay or movement will only drive the league’s best players to the NWSL at their first opportunity.
Merger Deferred or Expedited?
The effect of the players’ unionization on the Super League’s potential merger with the NWSL is uncertain. If the Super League agrees to the same player-friendly provisions as the NWSL, it will mitigate the NWSL’s competitive advantage. However, if both leagues permit widespread free agency, the leagues’ may end up in costly and unsustainable bidding wars like those that precipitated the mergers in other American sports leagues.
The unions will resist consolidation. As an initial matter, mergers historically result in the elimination of at least some teams, which means less jobs. Moreover, eliminating one of the leagues eliminates competition between the leagues for the players’ services, which would likely depress player salaries in at least the short-term. For similar reasons, the U.S. Department of Justice has been investigating the possible merger between the PGA TOUR and LIV Golf on antitrust (among other) grounds.
Operating a professional soccer team in the United States – men’s and women’s – is a money losing proposition, buffeted only by increased team valuations in the long run. Nevertheless, players asserting their rights will only make the businesses costlier.
The USLPA and NWSLPA did not respond to requests for comment.