Liberia: Court Rejects Acquittal Bid, but Key Questions Remain - FrontPageAfrica

01 Oct 2026, 05:54 · FrontPage Africa Online

Liberia: Court Rejects Acquittal Bid, but Key Questions Remain

Monrovia – Peter Bon Jallah’s lawyers asked Criminal Court “E” on Wednesday to end his trial before he ever had to answer the charges. Judge Wesseh Alphonsus Wesseh, Sr. said no.

By Willie N. Tokpah

But the ruling, handed down on Wednesday, September 30, decided less than it might appear. Judge Wesseh made clear he was not declaring Jallah guilty or innocent. He was saying only that the prosecution had produced enough evidence for the defense to answer before he makes up his mind.

The 63-year-old is on trial over allegations of gang rape, statutory rape and kidnapping involving a 16-year-old boy. He has denied the charges and chose to be tried by the judge alone, without a jury. That means one man will weigh every inconsistency, every piece of medical evidence and every word Jallah says when he takes the stand.

The Bar Was Low

To win Wednesday’s motion, the defense had to show that the prosecution’s evidence was “wholly insufficient,” the standard set by the Supreme Court in Republic of Liberia v. Robert A. Smith in 1976. That is a steep hill for any defense lawyer to climb.

The prosecution did not have to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt to survive. It only had to show evidence on each element of the charges. After calling 12 witnesses, including the alleged victim, police investigators, medical staff and a forensic expert from Rwanda, the judge ruled it had done that much.

He also refused to settle questions of who was telling the truth at this stage. Those questions remain open.

Where Was the Crime Scene?

The defense’s strongest point may be the one it made about Camp Johnson Road.

The alleged victim told the court he was taken to a place there and sexually abused. But according to the defense, Police Officer Lindsey Gould testified that investigators could not find or identify the location. A woman the boy said he encountered there was never produced in court.

The defense wanted that part of his testimony thrown out entirely. The judge declined to do so for now, but the problem has not gone away. Prosecutors will have to explain why police could not locate a place central to their own case, and why a potential witness never appeared.

Still, the Camp Johnson Road allegation is not the whole case. There are separate allegations tied to Jallah’s home in Airfield, which the defense itself acknowledged in its arguments. And courts have not always expected a traumatized teenager to give investigators precise directions.

Dates That Don’t Match

The defense also pointed to differences between what the boy told the court and what police wrote on the charge sheet about the dates and places of alleged encounters at the Airfield residence.

How much that matters will depend on the judge. Small gaps between a witness’s memory and a police officer’s paperwork are common. Gaps that go to the core of what happened, and when, are harder to explain away.

What the Medical Evidence Shows, and Doesn’t

A nurse testified that she observed lacerations and bruises on the alleged victim. The defense did not dispute the injuries. Its argument was that she never said, in so many words, that rape caused them.

That is often how medical testimony works. Nurses and doctors describe what they see and whether it is consistent with an allegation. They rarely swear to the cause.

The DNA evidence raises a similar question. The defense argued that the Rwandan expert’s analysis could not prove penetration, and could not on its own show that the offenses amounted to statutory rape or gang rape.

What the defense did not appear to argue, at least as described in the ruling, is that the DNA found no link at all. Its complaint was about the limits of what the science can prove. Exactly what the analysis matched, and to whom, has not been fully laid out in the public record, and it may end up carrying more weight than anything else in the case.

Who Else?

A charge of gang rape suggests more than one attacker. Yet the ruling says nothing about who else is alleged to have been involved, or whether anyone else has been identified or charged. Expect the defense to press hard on that question.

A Door the Defense Left Closed

Jallah’s lawyers also argued that the indictment itself was flawed. Judge Wesseh said that argument came too late. Citing Potter v. Republic and Logan v. Republic (1985), he ruled that such objections belonged in a motion to dismiss filed before the trial began.

Jallah’s Turn

Now the defense opens its case, and Jallah is expected to be its first witness.

It is a gamble. On the stand, he can give the court his own account and offer the explanation his lawyers need. He will also face cross-examination from prosecutors looking for any slip that undercuts the doubts his team has spent weeks raising.

Whatever he says may not be the last word. The prosecution has said it could call rebuttal witnesses after the defense rests.

One of Jallah’s lawyers excepted to Wednesday’s ruling and said the defense would take advantage of the statute governing exceptions, keeping the issue alive for possible appeal. The judge noted the exception.

Citing Allen Yancy v. Republic (1935), Judge Wesseh said all the circumstances of a case should be before the court before it reaches a decision. He ordered the trial to proceed “unhindered.”

Support Independent Journalism

Your support helps FrontPage Africa continue delivering independent, credible, and impactful journalism. Every contribution strengthens our ability to investigate, inform, and hold power accountable while keeping quality journalism accessible to our readers.

Support FrontPage Africa Subscribe to FrontPage Africa

Support our journalism or subscribe to receive the latest FrontPage Africa stories and updates.

Independent. Fearless. Liberian.

Support independent journalism

Your support helps FrontPage Africa keep investigating, informing and holding power to account, and keeps quality journalism free for every reader.

Support FrontPage Africa Get the newsletter

More in Legal Issues

View all

Liberia: How Chief Justice Gbeisay’s Judiciary is Bringing the Gavel Closer to the Ordinary in Bong County

Selma Lomax36 minutes ago

Liberia: ‘I am Not a Tribal Chief Justice,” – Chief Justice Gbeisay Responds to Public Reactions Following Gompa City Magisterial Court Ruling

Franklin Doloquee1 hour ago

Liberia: Criminal Court Rejects Peter Bon Jallah’s Acquittal Bid, Orders Him to Take Witness Stand

Willie N. Tokpah15 hours ago

Liberia: Court Rejects Acquittal Bid, but Key Questions Remain - FrontPageAfrica