Chip shortages forced China to find way to make cheaper AI models than US

by · EUobserver

If China’s Moonshot AI model can offer a fully-fledged alternative for less money, it could undermine the business model of its US competitors (Source: Tomáš Hrivňák.)

EU and the World

Unlock article and share
By Tomáš Hrivňák,
Bratislava
,

Chinese artificial intelligence start-ups are increasingly producing models that can compete with Western ones. They are also significantly cheaper to run.

China became a hub of industrial manufacturing because it was able to produce essentially the same goods as Western countries, but much more cheaply. Something similar is now happening in artificial intelligence.

Chinese models from DeepSeek, Z.AI and Moonshot AI are comparable in performance to US systems from OpenAI and Anthropic. However, the average cost of carrying out a standardised task using Kimi 2.6 or DeepSeek V4 Flash ranges from two to 33 cents. The same task costs $2.75 [€2.42] using Anthropic’s Claude Fable 5, according to the Chart of the Day, based on data from the Artificial Analysis benchmarking website, which Bloomberg published.

Chinese models undercut many Western flagship models on price
Cost in US dollars per standardised task

In red, Chinese artificial intelligence start-ups ; in blue, Western models. Source: Denník E / Tomáš Hrivňák. Data: Bloomberg, Artificial Analysis. Done with Flourish.

“Chinese start-ups have introduced a number of techniques to boost efficiency. In practice, this means they seek to get the most out of every unit of computing power,” said Selina Xu, China research lead for former Google chief executive Eric Schmidt, on the China Decode podcast.

US restrictions on exports of cutting-edge AI chips also forced them to take this approach. “As a result, their models are far more efficient, both in terms of capital and computing power, than models from OpenAI and Anthropic,” Xu added.

Leaders of OpenAI and Anthropic are sounding the alarm. They argue that powerful new models from China will lead to a “dystopian” future for artificial intelligence and, without regulation, pose unacceptable security risks.

Some analysts following the artificial intelligence sector, however, argue that the two companies are simply trying to weaken their competitors. At the same time, they are preparing to go public.

To read this story, log in or subscribe

Enjoy access to all articles and 25 years of archives, comment and gift articles. Become a subscriber for as low as €1,75 per week.

Read without limits
Already a subscriber? Login
Unlock article and share

Latest from Analysis

How Europe’s liberals are embracing the politics of security

When tech billionaires govern the sky: Musk, Thiel, Altman and the privatisation of space

Latest from China

The EU-China trade war: what if Beijing hits back?

Chinese Mission to the EU and Europe Jacques Delors jointly hold seminar on China-EU cooperation on Green transition

Latest from Digital

EU accuses TikTok of failing to protect teens’ privacy, risking billion euro fine

Listen: Can the EU fine Google, Apple, Meta, without angering Trump?

Latest from Tech

Commission slams Meta’s ‘addictive’ design of Facebook and Instagram for breaching EU law

EU watchdog questions commission’s secretive ‘Reality Checks’ with corporate lobbyists

Latest from EU and the World

[Interview] French-Palestinian MEP Rima Hassan: ‘Nobody believes in the two-state solution’

Death of French Epstein pimp Daniel Siad ends judicial case, leaving victims searching for justice

If China's Moonshot AI model can offer a fully-fledged alternative for less money, it could undermine the business model of its US competitors (Source: Tomáš Hrivňák.)

Topics

Author Bio

Tomáš Hrivňák is an economy reporter for Denník N. He studied Media Analysis and Research at Masaryk University and previously worked as a photojournalist. His reporting and photography have earned multiple awards, including the Slovak Press Photo and a Journalism Award for written reportage.

+ Follow author by email