Quantum Computing Advancements are Not A Real Threat to Bitcoin
by Omar Faridi · Crowdfund InsiderQuantum computing is not in any way a new or recent development. Much like AI and machine learning algorithms, these technologies really began to take shape in the early 21st century (around the year 2000 to 2010 with initial groundwork dating back to the 1960s). At the turn of the century, AI was showing signs of incredible progress and quantum computers were not far behind. More than 25 years ago, the main concept behind Bitcoin and other P2P digital currencies had already taken shape as well, but mostly within the cypherpunk communities led by Nick Szabo and other crypto pioneers.
While it is still unclear when exactly quantum computers will become advanced enough to pose a threat to current cryptographic systems, it is a sure bet that they will soon compromise existing security protocols. And Bitcoin would be no exception to that, however, the larger banking and digital commerce ecosystems will be impacted as well.
But a more careful examination of current software development trends indicates that concerns around the quantum computing threat is exaggerated. There are already dedicated teams such as those assembled by Adam Back‘s Blockstream (and other initiatives) already working on addressing the potential security threat from the rise of quantum computers. When the time is right, the technical experts should move forward with the necessary software upgrades to ensure the digital security of assets and online platforms in general.
At present, the real threat to Bitcoin could come from large BTC holders dumping or being forced to liquidate their holdings due to regulatory issues or their business models collapsing. The rise of digital asset treasury companies or DATs like Michael Saylor‘s Strategy (Nasdaq: MSTR) actually pose a major threat to bitcoin price stability as one very large holder could impact markets in a major way. It also raises centralization concerns as Strategy is approaching 1 million in BTC holdings (currently holding more than 800,000 Bitcoins). And there is nothing inherently present in the Bitcoin protocol to prevent one entity from holding such a large amount of the asset.
Moreover, Bitcoin transactions have been criticized for not providing an adequate level of privacy as all transfers are viewable on the public, permissionless blockchain network. This has led to the rise in adoption of privacy focused coins like Zcash (ZEC) and Monero (XMR) to some extent. Despite these challenges, Bitcoin has proved to be resilient with the flagship cryptocurrency recovering above the $80,000 mark after crashing to as low as $60,000 earlier this year (after setting an all-time high of $126,000+ on October 6, 2025).