India Cannot Be Broken and Peace in Bangladesh Cannot Be Built Upon Delusion

The outrageous claim made by a retired Bangladeshi general that Bangladesh will achieve peace only when India is broken into pieces is not only absurd but also dangerously irresponsible. Such rhetoric is rooted in delusion, ignorance and a reckless appetite for chaos. It deserves nothing less than a firm and unapologetic condemnation. No nation achieves stability by fantasizing about the destruction of its neighbor. No society finds harmony by celebrating hateful fantasies. And no leader even a retired one gains credibility by spewing venom detached from reality.

At the heart of this incendiary statement lies a toxic assertion that India must be shattered for Bangladesh to find peace. This claim is an insult to basic logic and a disgraceful attempt to inflame public sentiment. It tries to shift blame for internal issues by conjuring imaginary enemies. It tries to justify national weaknesses by inventing conspiracies. It attempts to distract people from real social and political challenges by pointing fingers outward instead of inward. In short it is a classic playbook of irresponsible leadership.

The crux of the matter is simple. India is not the reason for any instability within Bangladesh. India is not the cause of political friction social unrest or extremist agitation in that country. India is not a threat to Bangladesh peace or its territorial integrity. Anyone pretending otherwise is not speaking the truth they are manufacturing a convenient lie. The claim that Bangladesh will know peace only when India is torn apart is a cowardly attempt to avoid confronting the internal issues that genuinely demand attention.

Consider the implications of such a statement. To openly call for the fragmentation of a neighboring nation is not only a diplomatic insult but also a direct provocation that undermines regional harmony. It sabotages decades of cooperation on trade river water management security and humanitarian support. It disrespects the sacrifices made when the region fought for freedom from oppression. More importantly it encourages hostility where cooperation is desperately needed. The general who made this outrageous statement may enjoy the comfort of retirement but the poison he spreads will not retire from public discourse unless confronted firmly.

What purpose does such inflammatory rhetoric serve. It certainly does not help Bangladesh. It does not improve the economy. It does not strengthen democracy. It does not uplift the poor. It does not secure borders. It does not advance development. So why make such a remark. Because it is easier to blame India for imaginary conspiracies than to address real and pressing problems within the country. It is easier to target a neighbor than to fix corruption cronyism polarization and radicalization at home. It is easier to whip up hatred than to build consensus. It is easier to shout than to solve.

India is a diverse resilient democratic giant. It is not a fragile construct waiting to collapse because someone sitting across the border wishes it so. The idea that a nation of more than a billion people with a strong military robust institutions and deep cultural unity could simply fall apart is not merely wrong it is laughable. To present this fantasy as a precondition for peace in Bangladesh is to expose an alarming disconnect from reality. It is not strategic thinking it is political theater. It is not analysis it is agitation. It is not concern for peace it is an appetite for discord.

The most troubling aspect is the irresponsible messaging such statements deliver to impressionable minds. When a former officer with national influence declares that the destruction of another country is necessary for peace he encourages extremism. He validates hatred. He normalizes hostility. He empowers those who thrive on division. Such voices do not speak for the future of South Asia. They speak for the loudest and most reckless corners of public life. They undermine friendship between peoples who share history culture geography and intertwined futures.

If peace is the goal then cooperation is the path. If progress is the goal then partnership is the method. If development is the goal then stability is the foundation. None of these goals are served by wishing for a neighbors downfall. Bangladesh and India have benefited tremendously from collaboration. Trade corridors boost economies. Security cooperation counters extremism. Cross border energy projects power cities and factories. Cultural exchange builds goodwill. Every sensible leader knows this. Every responsible statesman protects this. Only those intoxicated by their own bitterness attempt to sabotage it.

The crux of this article is worth repeating clearly and without hesitation. India will not be broken to satisfy the fantasies of any warmongering commentator. Bangladesh will not gain peace by embracing delusion. And the region will not move forward as long as reckless voices push it backward. Stability in South Asia depends on maturity not melodrama on cooperation not confrontation and on truth not toxic propaganda.

Bangladesh deserves peace but peace will not come from inflammatory speeches. It will come from addressing internal political divisions from strengthening democratic institutions from combating extremism from improving governance and from fostering economic opportunities. These are achievable objectives. They are grounded in reality not fantasy. They require work not war and responsibility not rage.

India for its part will continue to grow and continue to engage constructively with its neighbors. It has no interest in destabilizing Bangladesh and no benefit in its turmoil. The general who made this statement may believe otherwise but beliefs are not facts and fantasies are not strategies.

In the end rhetoric cannot replace reality. Hate cannot replace harmony. And delusion cannot replace development. Anyone who claims that India must fall for Bangladesh to rise is not offering a vision but a warning. It is a warning of where reckless thinking leads and a reminder of why such rhetoric must be confronted aggressively loudly and without apology.

That is the truth. That is the crux. And that is why these claims deserve to be forcefully rejected.